![]() |
Base 16
Ok, here are the next few candidates for 16, all tested to n=4295. Last k tested was 47805
27592 27838 28593 28918 29445 30250 30397 31347 31912 32161 32350 32556 32673 33661 33771 34528 34543 35257 35320 35548 35818 35845 36735 37372 38440 38562 38776 39322 39337 39781 40000 40410 41530 42052 42376 42717 42745 43368 43398 43468 43485 44035 44131 44490 45306 45712 46471 46528 47176 47298 47395 47482 47616 |
Base 16 Sierpinski
And here is the last batch of Sierpinski 16, tested to n=5098
47818 48697 48772 48976 49386 49860 50166 50863 50865 51171 51427 52072 53226 53653 53941 54610 55306 55611 55846 55897 56866 57238 57795 57867 58582 58791 58855 59890 60070 60343 60541 60891 61617 61687 62802 63390 63405 63411 63853 64518 64620 65077 65127 65397 65536 square 65623 |
In post 112, k=40000 is square
|
[QUOTE=robert44444uk;97130]In post 112, k=40000 is square[/QUOTE]
You did not exclude numbers divisible by 16:grin: |
Sierpinski 16
I will reserve those above k=60000 and take them quite high
|
[QUOTE=Citrix;97131]You did not exclude numbers divisible by 16:grin:[/QUOTE]
True, can you spot them and weed them out |
Base 16 Sierpinski
Doing a quick check through the top 5000 site
42717*2^905792+1 is prime! L159 2005 44131*2^995972+1 is prime! SB3 2002 - very valuable "Seventeen or Bust", a first prime for 44131 and so this will save man years of work |
Base 18 Sierpinski
Unreserving Base18 Sierpinski
k=122 tested till n=110746 no primes found - anyone else want to try? 381*18^24108+1 is a probable prime. Do I have to register this prime somewhere? Prime Pages says, it is too small. k=18 and k=324 stopped testing, because k = base |
[quote=Xentar;97217]
381*18^24108+1 is a probable prime. Do I have to register this prime somewhere? Prime Pages says, it is too small. [/quote] Simply no. |
Base 12 Sierpinski
Prof Caldwell has pointed out an error in the k value quoted for Base 12 Sierpinski, due to me choosing the wrong covering set to analyse.
In fact the covering set 5,13,29 produces a Sierpinski at k=521, and nominal sieving leaves 261,378 and 404 to find primes for, in addition to the GFN k's 12 and 144. Recalculating gives the Riesel at 376, with the following unfound at n=5000 25,27,64,300,324 which are all highly composite (all 2,3, and 5), I will leave it to others to demonstrate that these factor (I am feeling lazy today) |
Base 16 Sierpinski
I looked at the base 16 sierpinski for all k >60000, report as follows:
k n prime 60343 5745 60541 44085 60891 10036 61617 7845 61687 8948 62802 42004 63390 23511 63411 18016 64518 36998 65127 5206 65397 6222 No primes were found for the following k, tested up to the following n: 60070 53562 63405 42335 63853 39256 64620 75696 65077 58138 65623 64630 Will reserve all between k=50000 and k=60000 |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 14:21. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.