I guess it's for the better of GIMPS. I'm pretty sure that if the original double-checkers did return an exponent some time from now, they'd still get credit (I could be wrong).

But at least a triple-check is better than a double-check. :P

[QUOTE=philmoore]Has it actually been confirmed that we have two matching residues for each of the exponents recently returned?[/QUOTE]

It has now! Nice job everybody!