mersenneforum.org

mersenneforum.org (https://www.mersenneforum.org/index.php)
-   Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 (https://www.mersenneforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=54)
-   -   A multiple k/c sieve for Sierpinski/Riesel problems (https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=5785)

geoff 2006-11-06 23:16

[QUOTE=Xentar;90566]Just found version 1.3.3 on the server.
Could you please tell us, what´s new in this version?[/QUOTE]
The only change in version 1.3.3 is that the number of found factors is written to the log file when the range is finished.

tnerual 2006-11-06 23:44

cool, no need to open the file with excel now ...:smile:

notepad is more memory friendly ... and less blue screener :sick:

geoff 2006-11-18 21:37

sr5sieve 1.3.4
 
A small change to the hashtable code makes it 3% faster for P2/P3, 1% faster for P4.

Xentar 2006-11-20 22:56

1.3.4 with newest .dat file:
83k p/s
It´s getting faster and faster :smile:

geoff 2006-11-22 02:05

sr5sieve 1.4.0, srsieve 0.6.0, bug fix.
 
These versions fix a serious bug in the i386 assembler 64-bit modular arithmetic functions that could cause some factors larger than 2^46 to be missed. All previous versions were affected by this bug. (But not the PPC or x86-64 variants). Luckily the distributed sieve has not yet reached 2^42, so no work needs to be repeated.

I have completely re-written the mulmod64() and powmod64() functions and tested them against GMP for random primes up to 2^62 (2^52 for non-assembler versions). For those who compile from source and have the GMP library installed, there is a 'srtest' program that will do these tests.

Xentar 2006-11-22 12:11

And the new version is 5 - 7% faster, nice :smile:

geoff 2006-11-24 03:09

[QUOTE=Xentar;92117]And the new version is 5 - 7% faster, nice :smile:[/QUOTE]

What type of machine is that result for?

On my P3 there is not much difference in speed between 1.3.4 and 1.4.0, 1% faster at most, but I found my P4/Celeron is about 7% faster.

Xentar 2006-11-24 08:08

Using a Core 2 Duo.
At the moment, it runs with 87k p/s (per core).

axn 2006-11-24 09:27

[QUOTE=geoff;92251]What type of machine is that result for?

On my P3 there is not much difference in speed between 1.3.4 and 1.4.0, 1% faster at most, but I found my P4/Celeron is about 7% faster.[/QUOTE]

Around 7% improvement in my P-M (went from 44.5 to 47.5)

michaf 2006-11-24 09:57

On Athlon 64-x2 around 0.5-1% faster

geoff 2006-11-25 23:16

sr5sieve 1.4.2
 
This version is about 10% faster on my P3 and 15% faster on my P4 Celeron compared to 1.4.0, mainly from improving the FPU instruction scheduling in the new mulmod/powmod code.


All times are UTC. The time now is 20:52.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.