[QUOTE=chalsall;545110]Seconded.

Another (IMO more serious) issue is [URL="https://www.mersenne.org/assignments/?exp_lo=91000000&exp_hi=92000000&exdchk=1&exfirst=1&exp1=1"]the 1002 assignments in the "Cat 1" 91M range.[/URL]

The assignee, SRS Technology, has some compute behind him. But these need to be worked in the next few days, or else expired. He's about to hoard from the LL'ers.[/QUOTE]

Cat 1 expiration is still turned off due to COVID and access to hardware issues. This hasn't stopped poaching in both the FT and DC ranges. A bunch of exponents that were on inaccessible machines have been poached.

PrimeNet Activity Summary Report appears to be stuck at 2020-05-13 12:00 UTC.

Correction: it is just the header. The figures seem to be updating properly.

[QUOTE=S485122;545035]IMO once an exponent is in CAT 2, but even more in CAT 1 it should not possible to assign it for manual testing and certainly not for trial factoring.

Jacob[/QUOTE]
I don't see a reason, why these exponents shouldn't be available to TF. They are already double-checked, and thus out of DC Cat 0. I think of TF on double-checked numbers as an even slower running wave of proving composite - it's Cat 0 lowest exponent is 1277, and it will probably be for a long time from now.

[QUOTE=lycorn;545318]PrimeNet Activity Summary Report appears to be stuck at 2020-05-13 12:00 UTC.

Correction: it is just the header. The figures seem to be updating properly.[/QUOTE]
I can confirm, ([URL="https://www.mersenne.org/primenet/"]here[/URL]) it is stuck on 12:00, but on all top producer lists it's working properly.

[QUOTE=Viliam Furik;545325]I don't see a reason, why these exponents shouldn't be available to TF. They are already double-checked, and thus out of DC Cat 0. I think of TF on double-checked numbers as an even slower running wave of proving composite - it's Cat 0 lowest exponent is 1277, and it will probably be for a long time from now.[/QUOTE]
No, they haven't been DC'ed.
[url]https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=50740883&exp_hi=&full=1[/url]
It has one LL, not 2. The level of numbers that it makes sense to do any more TF is higher than 1277. Some would have factors found with bigger P-1. But, lower ones should have ECM done before pulling out the big factoring guns out.

[QUOTE=Viliam Furik;545325]I don't see a reason, why these exponents shouldn't be available to TF. They are already double-checked, and thus out of DC Cat 0. I think of TF on double-checked numbers as an even slower running wave of proving composite - it's Cat 0 lowest exponent is 1277, and it will probably be for a long time from now.[/QUOTE]I referred to numbers in the Categories as defined on the [url=https://www.mersenne.org/thresholds/]Thresholds page : https://www.mersenne.org/thresholds/[/url].

Is it possible you confused this thread with the one about getting to less than 2000 unfactored numbers "Thinking out loud about getting under 20M unfactored exponents " ?

I do hope that that project will not work in the three lowest categories of both ranges because it would impede the progress (advances towards the completion of milestones) of GIMPS. Feel free to work on exponents that are already verified (successfully double-checked) in those ranges though.

Jacob

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;545338]No, they haven't been DC'ed.
[url]https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=50740883&exp_hi=&full=1[/url]
It has one LL, not 2.[/QUOTE]

My mistake, they were higher in the list, and my brain didn't bother to properly check that the exponents are smaller than those which are being DC'ed - they are higher, thus they are not under smallest to-be-DC'ed exponent. I guess there should be an error-check for the human brain... It would solve a lot of problems!

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;545338]
The level of numbers that it makes sense to do any more TF is higher than 1277. Some would have factors found with bigger P-1. But, lower ones should have ECM done before pulling out the big factoring guns out.[/QUOTE]
I know, but 1277 is the lowest non-factored exponent, so it can be viewed as the lowest Cat 0 exponent of the AMFF (Absolute Mersenne Factoring Front).

Grrrr.... I want my candies! :tantrum:

[QUOTE]
[COLOR=darkgreen]processing: LL for [URL="https://www.mersenne.org/M101998087"]M101998087[/URL][/COLOR]
[COLOR=red]Error: Checksum (70FblahB1) does not match! Please check the results line carefully.
Email [EMAIL="woltman@blah.blah.edu"]woltman@blah.blah.edu[/EMAIL] if you cannot find the problem.[/COLOR]
[/QUOTE]
This is V29.1 build 15, untouched, legal (i.e. we didn't do any trick!)

[QUOTE=LaurV;545857]Error: Checksum (70FblahB1) does not match! Please check the results line carefully.[/QUOTE]PM me the result line in question, please?

Done.

[QUOTE=LaurV;545857]This is V29.1 build 15, untouched, legal (i.e. we didn't do any trick!)[/QUOTE]That's a long way from current (2017; V29.8b6 is from 2019 and current). Why the old version?
Also you've already reported a 0-shift LL result for that same exponent, perhaps from gpuowl. And the bits of unmasked residue do not match.