![]() |
The [c]mersenne.info[/c] domain expired some time ago. It should be removed from the list of download mirrors.
|
[QUOTE=ixfd64;512053]The [c]mersenne.info[/c] domain expired some time ago. It should be removed from the list of download mirrors.[/QUOTE]
I was going to fix it but either George or James beat me to it. :smile: |
Prime95 PRP DC work preference set, PRP TC received, primenet considers it a PRP first-time
Switched an old i3 laptop from P-1 to PRPDC work type in prime95 V29.4b8 recently.
It finished its assigned P-1 and was assigned and began a PRPDC. Sort of. Worktodo entry is PRP=[I](aid redacted)[/I],1,2,79335979,-1,75,0,3,1 prime.log says: [CODE][Thu Mar 28 03:37:00 2019 - ver 29.4] Getting assignment from server PrimeNet success code with additional info: Server assigned PRP work. Got assignment [I](aid redacted)[/I]: PRP M79335979 Sending expected completion date for M79335979: Apr 23 2020 PrimeNet success code with additional info: WARNING: Estimated completion date is more than one year away. The assignment may be reassigned to another user after one year.[/CODE]The system had a low throttle setting for P-1. I've subsequently raised the throttle setting, from 20 to 35, so it should complete in well under a year. Prime95 Test, Status is indicating completion in April 2020, but the worker window estimate is 87 days, on the client. Per [URL]https://www.mersenne.org/thresholds/[/URL], as an exponent above 51828902, it should be a cat4 DC with up to 360 days to complete. (Although, that page mentions LL tests but not PRP for first time test categories, and "LL and DC" but not PRP for category requirements. That page could use a rewrite to fully include PRP or generalize to primality test.) [URL]https://www.mersenne.org/workload/[/URL] is indicating the assignment as a first time "PRP" test, cat 0, expiration 28 days from now, ETA April 2020, not work type PRP DC or a fitting expiration for that work type. [URL]https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=79335979&full=1[/URL] shows it's a third PRP check of the exponent, although the first two are of differing PRP residue types 4 and 1, so it's probably a DC for one or the other. But it indicates the current assignment as "PRP test" not "PRP DC". (It would be good if the prime95 worker window title indicated which PRP residue type is being run, and first test or DC, but I don't think even v29.7 would indicate PRP residue type of a run or first vs. DC.) Please check/fix the status of this assignment, and address how primenet seems to be treating a PRP DC/TC as a first PRP test for future assignments. Unless perhaps it's an issue with prime95 v29.4b8 somehow. |
Just confirmed by upgrading the instance in the preceding post to v29.7b1 x64 prime95, that it does not indicate DC or residue type in the worker title.
|
Unable to add manual results
Sorry to ask for this but I was trying to upload the results from my GPU manual testing and I think I'm unable to do so. Is there any problem with the server?
|
Known issue: manual results are [url=https://mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=513897&postcount=156]currently disabled[/url] because [url=https://mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=513892&postcount=153]people are jerks[/url].
|
[QUOTE=erick84mm;513900]Sorry to ask for this but I was trying to upload the results from my GPU manual testing and I think I'm unable to do so. Is there any problem with the server?[/QUOTE]
Manual results are disabled for now, due to idiots turning in fake results. Hold on to your results until it is open again: [url]https://mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=24103[/url] |
1 Attachment(s)
That explains why I can't submit my gpu72.com results -- guess I will have to try another day
|
I was about to post a screenshot showing my [B]Internet Explorer 8[/B] on [B]XP[/B] being unable to report manual results, when I saw ixfd64's post.
That's too bad, I was all set to complain about age discrimination at mersenne.org. :smile: |
Aaron re-enabled the page. Login is now required.
|
The server accepted a lot of results from an anonymous with the same obvious wrong LL residue like
[url]http://www.mersenne.ca/exponent/83294507[/url] Can someone check the server and remove all results with this residue? |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 23:05. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.