![]() |
[QUOTE=ramgeis;503672]Is there a page where those results marked as "Suspect" are listed or can be queried?[/QUOTE]
Some are assigned, but here's the list. There are another couple dozen that were marked suspect but were then done by one or more PRP tests, so I didn't count those. [CODE]82537759 82860199 82891157 82924747 82935803 82945781 82946033 82946221 83005397 83005721 83009137 83013389 83058883 83062121 83083031 83085173 83089399 83111711 83142533 83147101 83169811 83174053 83176853 83184817 83221181 83282207 83283059 83324473 83329171 83337623 83357363 83383127 83383291 83444719 83450743 83456669 83624993 83664209 83666419 83668471 83713897 83722621 83766469 83767049 83781109 83788049 83848129 83863411 83886941 83904719 83905483 83908777 83909471 83918279 83967011 83975377 83983057 83983411 83990327 83990521 84033259 84039287 84088591 84135823 84141763 84142001 84150949 84226553 84227501 84229919 84230039 84239587 84269093 84269299 84290293 84307651 84310949 84337261 84361279 84384977 84388397 84388589 84392071 84400847 84401831 84402049 84404899 84408967 84409093 84410257 84423721 84424591 84425591 84435577 84445993 84467197 84470681 84473933 84482107 84488993 84489799 84490453 84491269 84497267 84502849 84510473 84516479 84517079 84523519 84524953 84528571 84529691 84531301 84532271 84534337 84536831 84545129 84546071 84548921 84566179 84567949 84571537 84575581 84586493 84591329 84592657 84596459 84624707 84645107 84645683 84650471 84674053 84690323 84705557 84705589 84705871 84708373 84727207 84729409 84731161 84745081 84747001 84761029 84781219 84800917 84815147 84829093 84829607 84830483 84835951 84851147 84865481 84865673 84874787 84875629 84878141 84904081 84918091 84919729 84924451 84932737 84934441 84939133 84940957 84959957 84965599 84966199 84966361 84966829 84969491 84994981 84995717 85010147 85034359 85040303 85069591 85069627 85098743 85100627 85102363 85123963 85126661 85134853 85161859 85162757 85162793 85191259 85192157 85194787 85211921 85216567 85225159 85237759 85247069 85260653 85261279 85262477 85284181 85290167 85334863 85339651 85343759 85355161 85357369 85403849 85411343 85463449 85464647 85468003 85472011 85482907 85515527 85516427 85542493 85548299 85592011 85592099 85622617 85625093 85639163 85639171 85640549 85642049 85643693 85667149 85678693 85755521 85758067 85764181 85764599 85769527 85777177 85815823 85826189 85838471 85839779 85856657 85861619 85873657 85876969 85881343 85906759 85908959 85956457 85957103 85976797 85984817 85991819 86022631 86032439 86049349 86059877 86065391 86070317 86084329 86100181 86113297 86115209 86125649 86133961 86143697 86177687 86180513 86189443 86191177 86200273 86212601 86217587 86238107 86245343 86247787 86272019 86294291 86294927 86311957 86350543 86432911 86443859 86495869 86515369 86527979 86534593 86564771 86565341 86569271 86589031 86599867 86603567 86612107 86629819 86710223 86743183 86747741 86752489 86818471 86819597 86819737 86844271 86874871 86936599 86971481 86991211 87005467 87036589 87073003 87131831 87136547 87148891 87173707 87222197 87238663 87253603 87266027 87270709 87283439 87293033 87305887 87309037 87309259 87319759 87406373 87406889 87472709 87544099 87614563 87750577 88188547 88304767 88344499 98109463 98110109 98110121 98110763 98111977 98999777 123456811 129057361 332196427 332196607 332197123 332216777 332227579 332229923 332242501 332250197 332340061 332980399 340705633 402637217[/CODE] |
PRP results
The link to the detailed report [url=https://www.mersenne.org/report_prp/?exp_lo=2&exp_hi=&exp_date=&end_date=&user_only=0&user_id=&dispdate=1&B1=]PRP results[/url] is missing from the site. The coding is done because the page exists, just the link is missing.
Jacob |
[QUOTE=S485122;504457]The link to the detailed report [url=https://www.mersenne.org/report_prp/?exp_lo=2&exp_hi=&exp_date=&end_date=&user_only=0&user_id=&dispdate=1&B1=]PRP results[/url] is missing from the site. The coding is done because the page exists, just the link is missing.[/QUOTE]
A couple of small refinements: In the bottom section "Test results where factor was found later", the exponents are not blue-linked. Also, [URL="https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?p=501612&postcount=890"]preda found a factor with his hybrid PRP−1 method[/URL], but [URL="https://www.mersenne.org/report_prp/?exp_lo=89000000&exp_hi=90000000&exp_date=&end_date=&user_only=0&user_id=&dispdate=1&B1="]the PRP results report[/URL] incorrectly includes the exponent ([M]M89625761[/M]) in the "Test results where factor was found later" section. |
[QUOTE=GP2;504468]A couple of small refinements:
In the bottom section "Test results where factor was found later", the exponents are not blue-linked. Also, [URL="https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?p=501612&postcount=890"]preda found a factor with his hybrid PRP−1 method[/URL], but [URL="https://www.mersenne.org/report_prp/?exp_lo=89000000&exp_hi=90000000&exp_date=&end_date=&user_only=0&user_id=&dispdate=1&B1="]the PRP results report[/URL] incorrectly includes the exponent ([M]M89625761[/M]) in the "Test results where factor was found later" section.[/QUOTE] I think I put that page together pretty quick back when we were getting PRP stuff going, and then I forgot about it. I basically copied the code for the LL result page, tweaked a bit, and then left it for later (which is "now", I suppose). I can look into it again "later". :smile: I spent some time over my Christmas break doing a few other interesting tweaks to the site. One involved mocking up some code to be able to at least display factoring info for exponents above 1 billion (for now I just copied the factoring info from mersenne.ca so long term this would need more real-time integration). As it is, James' site is still the source-of-truth for that and better to use, but in the future, who knows... maybe Prime95 can add factoring support for those larger exponents. The second big tweak I did was revamping the "forgot password" page. It now emails you a one-time link to reset your password rather than fuss with the dubious secret question/response stuff. It means having a valid email address if you ever need to reset your password, but that makes sense. Well, I guess a 3rd tweak I mocked up was adding recaptcha to the sign-up page, but honestly we don't have a problem with bots signing up, it was more of a "let's see how it looks" type of thing, and easy to implement. Probably won't go live. |
Zombie TF assignments
1 Attachment(s)
I'm seeing some weird behavior with some TF assignments.
Here is the outline of events: 1. On April 8, 2018, I reserved about 300 TF assignments in the 98.6M exponent range from bitlevels 71 to 72. 2. For some reason (human error?), I allowed those assignments to expire on June 7, 2018. 3. On November 28, 2018, I reserved these exponents again. Still for TF to 72 bits. 4. On December 13, 2018, I reported results and got strange error messages (results not needed, processing anyway, rewarding credit). 5. Recently, I noticed that the November 28th reservation was still active, but the assignment had changed from "TF to 72 bits" to "TF to 73 bits" 6. Today, I reported results for some of these exponents. Again, I got the error message and the reservation got bumped up a bit level. Is this a bug or the desired behavior? It seems like a flaky response to the case of a user reserving work that he previously allowed to expire. I attached a screenshot of the exponent status page for one of the exponent assignments in question. |
[QUOTE=masser;505547]
Is this a bug or the desired behavior?.[/QUOTE] Without delving into the PHP code, I'm not surprised by the behavior. Is it desirable -- probably not. |
[QUOTE=Prime95;505551]Without delving into the PHP code, I'm not surprised by the behavior. Is it desirable -- probably not.[/QUOTE]
If bitlevels are skipped, it can be detrimental (i.e. somebody reserves a 72 and let it expire, and the next guy in line gets a 73). Just thinking out loud, I didn't do any test. |
At least in the above example no bitlevels were skipped:[M]M98624297[/M], perhaps just assigned to a higher bitlevel than the user expected?
|
No bitlevels have been skipped. There just seems to be no way for me to complete the assignments. I'll let them expire and we'll see what happens when the next worker reserves them. I suspect it will be fine.
Here's an example of the error message: processing: TF no-factor for M98624831 (272-273) Result type (4) inappropriate for the assignment type (unknown). Processing result but not deleting assignment. CPU credit is 9.6985 GHz-days. |
Right now, I keep getting a message saying "No assignment available meeting CPU, program code, and work preference requirements". Then it lists a cpu # as 0 and a user ID number. What do I do?
|
[QUOTE=Jwb52z;506670]Right now, I keep getting a message saying "No assignment available meeting CPU, program code, and work preference requirements". Then it lists a cpu # as 0 and a user ID number. What do I do?[/QUOTE]
Yep I'm getting the same thing here. |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 23:06. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.