![]() |
[QUOTE=Uncwilly;490807]Guessing that it is the PRP that is throwing it off.:picard:[/QUOTE]
It should be countdown to completing first time tests below the classic 79.3 million limit |
It should indeed.
|
split cpus, can't merge, or even drop one
Replacing the HD in a prime95 worker system led to a duplicate cpu entry for me. Same hardware description and name. Usually I can merge duplicates using the cells near the bottom of [url]https://www.mersenne.org/cpus/[/url] (merge checked cpus etc). Not this time. Well, maybe it would help if they didn't have identical system names I thought. I was able to rename one with lots of past ghz-days associated with it but no current work. Nope, still can't merge them, can't drop one either. Instead of merge working as usually, I get a big red banner at the top stating CPU (a) reported results after CPU (b) was created.
Names are dodo and leno currently. Same physical box. |
[QUOTE=kriesel;491128] I get a big red banner at the top stating CPU (a) reported results after CPU (b) was created..[/QUOTE]
Did you try "date override"? |
1 Attachment(s)
[QUOTE=Prime95;491131]Did you try "date override"?[/QUOTE]
No. Never heard of it before that I recall. Where should that option appear? No such thing appears on the cpus page or the individual cpu pages when I retrieve them. I'm running Firefox 61.0 x64 on Windows. If you meant this &date_override=99, [URL]http://mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=151936&postcount=185[/URL] that gave me a 404 error. |
Hmmm, that option is only available to me!
For at least a little while it will now be available to everyone. Hope it works. |
[QUOTE=Prime95;491140]For at least a little while it will now be available to everyone. Hope it works.[/QUOTE]
Yeah... No disrespect intended, but don't make anything available to yourself which isn't available to everyone. And, listen to your users... |
[QUOTE=Prime95;491140]Hmmm, that option is only available to me!
For at least a little while it will now be available to everyone. Hope it works.[/QUOTE] Thank you, that did it. |
[QUOTE=Chuck;490825]It should be countdown to completing first time tests below the classic 79.3 million limit[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=ckdo;490827]It should indeed.[/QUOTE] The wording is still wrong. |
There appears to be an issue with manually reporting ECM results:
[COLOR=darkgreen]processing: ECM no-factor for [URL="https://www.mersenne.org/M2539"]M2539[/URL] (B1=110,000,000, B2=900,514,153,782)[/COLOR] Notice: Undefined index: timing in C:\inetpub\v5\v5server\gimps\0.95_cpu_credit.inc.php on line 72 [COLOR=blue]CPU credit is 0.0000 GHz-days.[/COLOR] Notice: Undefined index: timing in C:\inetpub\v5\v5server\gimps\0.95_cpu_credit.inc.php on line 72 However, the curves appear to have been successfully submitted, just no credit was granted. This isn't a problem for me, but I thought I'd report it, just in case something underneath is broken. |
[QUOTE=heliosh;492408]There appears to be an issue with manually reporting ECM results:[/QUOTE]
Fixed, thanks. |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 23:08. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.