![]() |
How far did you ECM all the numbers?
|
[QUOTE=10metreh;180705]How far did you ECM all the numbers?[/QUOTE]Why don't you ask the ECMnet server and find out for yourself?
;-) Paul |
[quote=xilman;180709]Why don't you ask the ECMnet server and find out for yourself?
;-) Paul[/quote] I never could manage to access the web interface on the homogeneous Cunningham ECMnet server (even though it works fine for other servers); is there something I'm missing, or is that server simply running an older version of the software which doesn't have the web interface? |
11+5,142 done
r1=117336807247717742305795997703848105550529659593 (pp48) r2=121038320298605687058199255783413943431083184202810444221437766869 (pp66) |
[QUOTE=unconnected;180732]11+5,142 done
r1=117336807247717742305795997703848105550529659593 (pp48) r2=121038320298605687058199255783413943431083184202810444221437766869 (pp66)[/QUOTE]By SNFS? Paul |
Yes, by SNFS.
Also I did several easy 10x from extended tables, where to post results? |
[QUOTE=unconnected;180811]Yes, by SNFS.
Also I did several easy 10x from extended tables, where to post results?[/QUOTE]It's best to mail me the factors as I'm much more likely to notice them in my Inbox than I am to see them here. My address is paul{at}leyland.vispa.com Paul |
Update
I'm just about to upload the first update to the tables since they were extended.
There are 81 new factors found in the last ten days, the great majority by ECM. It's good to see the old-faithful factorers still producing new results. There are now 1414 composites left in the tables. Updating the ECMnet server with the factors found elsewhere will take a little time. Until then, there's a chance that the server will allocate numbers which have already been (at least partially) factored. I'll try to keep that chance as small as reasonable. Paul |
[QUOTE=xilman;182047]I'm just about to upload the first update to the tables since they were extended.
There are 81 new factors found in the last ten days, the great majority by ECM. It's good to see the old-faithful factorers still producing new results. There are now 1414 composites left in the tables. Updating the ECMnet server with the factors found elsewhere will take a little time. Until then, there's a chance that the server will allocate numbers which have already been (at least partially) factored. I'll try to keep that chance as small as reasonable. Paul[/QUOTE] I will wait before starting with NFS. There are two reasons: (1) The reservations page does not show the new composites and I don't want to poach. (2) Since the new numbers are not reserved, and since many are still easy, there is a good chance that any number I choose will be picked off by someone else using ECM as I am doing it via NFS. |
[QUOTE=xilman;182047]I'm just about to upload the first update to the tables since they were extended.
There are 81 new factors found in the last ten days, the great majority by ECM. It's good to see the old-faithful factorers still producing new results. There are now 1414 composites left in the tables. Updating the ECMnet server with the factors found elsewhere will take a little time. Until then, there's a chance that the server will allocate numbers which have already been (at least partially) factored. I'll try to keep that chance as small as reasonable. Paul[/QUOTE] Please note that I reported to Paul that there were two numbers (from the old list) that had been taken off the reservations page, but which did not appear in the update. |
[QUOTE=R.D. Silverman;182053]Please note that I reported to Paul that there were two numbers
(from the old list) that had been taken off the reservations page, but which did not appear in the update.[/QUOTE]I have yet to receive the factors for these two. Unfortunately, I can't report factorizations that I have not received. Tom: you reading this thread? Paul |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 23:08. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.