![]() |
[QUOTE=R.D. Silverman;85995]Is anyone but P. Ochem and me working on these?
I predicted that people would pick off the low hanging fruit then give up.......[/QUOTE] I'm still working on these with an old machine. |
[QUOTE=bhebden;86012]I'm still working on these with an old machine.[/QUOTE]
What machine? I got my last two results on a single, 6 year old 1.5GHz Pentium IV running SNFS. It is doing 6,5,199- now and will then do 6,5,199+. Progress *can* be made on these numbers with limited resources. I was just wondering if anyone else was working on them. Your help is appreciated. Have you had any result luck? |
[QUOTE=R.D. Silverman;85995]Is anyone but P. Ochem and me working on these?
I predicted that people would pick off the low hanging fruit then give up.......[/QUOTE] em99010pepe PM-ed me a couple of times about setting up NFS on these numbers. To my shame, I've been so swamped in Real Life (tm) that I've only been able to give him the bare minimum of information :redface: Something that hasn't helped me is that he's running under Windows and almost all my experience these days is with various flavours of Unix. I know that you're primarily Windows-based at present. Perhaps you could PM em99010pepe to provide encouragement and practical assistance and advice. Paul |
[QUOTE=R.D. Silverman;86023]What machine? I got my last two results on a single, 6 year old
1.5GHz Pentium IV running SNFS. It is doing 6,5,199- now and will then do 6,5,199+. Progress *can* be made on these numbers with limited resources. I was just wondering if anyone else was working on them. Your help is appreciated. Have you had any result luck?[/QUOTE] Maybe old isn't the right term. How about ancient? It's a dual Celeron 533MHz (PII era) with 256M memory running Linux. I've been picking at numbers with ecm but just managed to get ggnfs working on it. After a little testing, I'll pick a number to tackle. |
6,5,199-
[QUOTE=bhebden;86028]Maybe old isn't the right term. How about ancient?
It's a dual Celeron 533MHz (PII era) with 256M memory running Linux. I've been picking at numbers with ecm but just managed to get ggnfs working on it. After a little testing, I'll pick a number to tackle.[/QUOTE] Here are the last two factors of 6,5,199-. I am doing 6,5,199+ now. 73235398878728778466185821338895097877863979441. 80122023416338032704379487052044551557165340151329644118336041588363197801 |
I'm going to work on 4,3,321-
|
6,5,199+
[QUOTE=R.D. Silverman;86252]Here are the last two factors of 6,5,199-. I am doing 6,5,199+ now.
73235398878728778466185821338895097877863979441. 80122023416338032704379487052044551557165340151329644118336041588363197801[/QUOTE] Here are the last two factors of 6,5,199+ 189570450187139391022860038443671590776826836028380193 3443170314736909630907478463614458280974511909490886344005607929597742879790085491 I have started 4,3,263-. |
Two factors of 10,9,157-:
405558488817141506419108733521941769 (p36) 24657354292887470444023523078845263922544205624674076316811413035718360424334918004145991478794548037795728890593295479199 (p122) Furthermore I did 2450 3e6-curves at 10,9,151-, but no factors appeared. |
Here are all factors of 10,9,131-:
(p5) 37991 (p9) 302166173 (p35) 56499900010871724877093588870421213 (p84) 154179030793417777315567782696687371293265698053622025455801965802076226635816595449 |
4,3,321- C121 factors into
p44=89694285723291483771682357204846604055750409 p77=79661910417714569528947568789660883989912548607312169875696384157995759796469 By ecm. |
4,3,263-
[QUOTE=bhebden;87888]4,3,321- C121 factors into
p44=89694285723291483771682357204846604055750409 p77=79661910417714569528947568789660883989912548607312169875696384157995759796469 By ecm.[/QUOTE] Here are the last two factors of 4,3,263-. I am doing 4,3,269-. 398502613298402202433123215678249244659625902383 6568003823571485773767410106244538953935809102991895452787777691899867041683 |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 15:41. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.