![]() |
[QUOTE=LaurV;555388]Nope. The only illogical thing is, if SL ran as fast as she could, how come SM arrived first to the convent? :razz:[/QUOTE]
They split up. SM knew vector math and went directly toward the convent. SL obviously ran at an angle of 45 to 180 degrees from SM. |
[QUOTE=LaurV;555388]Nope. The only illogical thing is, if SL ran as fast as she could, how come SM arrived first to the convent? :razz:[/QUOTE]
Logically, she took a longer, roundabout way to reach the convent. [...and after seeing the goods on offer, indulging in a right royally shagging, logically. ;) Cue the monster-with-pants-down scene from [i]Young Frankenstein[/i]: "woof!" Yes, I know, gross, sexist, NSFW...] |
[QUOTE=ewmayer;555403]Logically, she took a longer, roundabout way to reach the convent[/QUOTE]
That's illogical when she knew she was in danger. Retina's explanation makes more sense :razz: |
[QUOTE=LaurV;555416]Retina's explanation makes more sense :razz:[/QUOTE]So no explanation makes sense? :confused:
|
[QUOTE=retina;555418]So no explanation makes sense? :confused:[/QUOTE]
Ha! I guess something is wrong with me, or between me and Uncwilly, first he said something and I remembered that Xilman said it, then now he said something again and I assumed you said it... (reality is I read stuff, then do other things, then come back and reply to some posts, and in between, I have some memory errors, maybe I overclock too much? :w00t:) Sorry. |
[QUOTE=LaurV;555431]... I have some memory errors, maybe I overclock too much?[/QUOTE]You have no excuse for that when ECC RAM is a thing.
Or were you constructed before ECC was around? :shock: |
[QUOTE=LaurV;555416]That's illogical when she knew she was in danger.[/QUOTE]
Not at all - as Sister Logical explained, if they continued together the stalker was guaranteed to catch them and presumably do unspeakable things to both of them. They were already on the most direct route to the convent, so whether the splitting-up took one on a longer path was immaterial - no matter what, the stalker would definitely catch whichever one he decided to continue following. It's also perfectly logical if you understand the real reason for SL taking the longer path, which is that she felt in need of a shagging, but wanted a bit of privacy to do it in. Taking the roundabout path gave her that, along with a built-in excuse as to why she took so long to reach the convent. And before anyone asks "but how did she know the stalker would follow her and not Sister Mathematical", it's perfectly logical - as soon as SL and SM split up, SL slowed down just a bit to make herself "easy prey", as it were. She may have also given a seductive tilt to her wimple, sex-crazed guys are known to really go for that sort of thing. |
Haha, you went to such a long extent to explain all of that :lol:
This reminds me of another similar joke where a stalker (maybe it was the same one??) caught a nun and did the thing to her, to which she more or less did not (strongly) object. Then after all the excitement was finished, they were laying on the grass, and he asked her what she will tell to the abbot when she will return to the convent, if he will ask why she was late. She replied "well, I will say that a stalker caught me and did the thing to me twice". "How comes, you will do such a sin, I only did it to you once". "Why, are you in hurry?" |
[QUOTE=LaurV;555521]Haha, you went to such a long extent to explain all of that :lol:
This reminds me of another similar joke where a stalker (maybe it was the same one??) caught a nun and did the thing to her, to which she more or less did not (strongly) object. Then after all the excitement was finished, they were laying on the grass, and he asked her what she will tell to the abbot when she will return to the convent, if he will ask why she was late. She replied "well, I will say that a stalker caught me and did the thing to me twice". "How comes, you will do such a sin, I only did it to you once". "Why, are you in hurry?"[/QUOTE] :devil: :shock: |
Re. "are you in a hurry?" -- Again invoking the scene in [url=https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0072431/quotes]Young Frankenstein[/url], erm I mean Young Fronkensteen, where Madeline Kahn's character is ravished by the monster:
[quote][i][after sex with The Monster][/i] Elizabeth: Oh. Where you going?... Oh, you men are all alike. Seven or eight quick ones and then you're out with the boys to boast and brag. YOU BETTER KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT. Oh... I think I love him.[/quote] That scene is surely considered highly misogynistic by today's PC standards ... to us fans is just a hilarious, ribald send-up of the classic horror movie trope, where the monster carries off the beautiful girl. I mean, what else is he gonna do with her - have her cook and clean for him? [OK, maybe he would have her do that, as well.] The end-of-film scenes of their later domestic life - after Dr. F has infused the monster with part of his own brain to counteract the abnormal brain's abnormal tendencies - are hilarious: the monster sitting up in bed, complacently reading the [i]Wall Street Journal[/i], while Elizabeth putters about doing domestic-fussbudget stuff: [quote]Elizabeth: [i][to The Monster][/i] Honey, did you see I put another hamper in the bathroom? This one's for your shirts, the other's just for socks and poo-poo undies.[/quote] Ah, the late, great Madeline Kahn, who died too young, in 1999 at age 57. She played serial nymphomaniacal characters in Mel Brooks films - in addition to the above, also in [i]Blazing Saddles[/i] and [i]History of the World, Part 1[/i][strike][/url][/strike], but per IMDB, "According to Mel Brooks, she was--contrary to her screen image--quite shy and reserved in real life." |
It appears that the Russian Covid vaccine has a 50% success rate.
It was tested on Putin's daughter and Navalny. |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 19:30. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.