[quote=davieddy;179894]If you've ever heard a description of the relative size of
an atom and a nucleus, you would realize that the two things
(atomic and nuclear physics) can usefully be treated separately
(and perterbation theory is pretty accurate).

"Atomic" physics considers electrons "orbiting" around a fixed
point charge Ne. Is there really some limit on N?

The question "what elements are possible?" boils down to
"what nuclei are stable?" which is nuclear physics.

Of all the inappropriate analogies in all the world, I have
never encountered a worse one than the one between gravity
and the strong nuclear force you suggested.[/quote]

"Is there really some limit on N?"?????

Yes and no.

The atomic table is from 1 to 200.
There is a math proof that proves this number is exact.
Thus max(Np) = max(Ne) = 200.
There is of course thus a value for max(Nn),
and Mass(atom) = Mass(protons+neutrons+electrons), so that
also has a maximum, so you can, if you think it necessary, compute
the number of neutrons in the largest possible atom of Endon(200).

Have fun,and if there's more to add, go ahead.

[QUOTE=davar55;179928]Black holes, being so densely packed, have a lot of gravity.
This ultimately results in the formation, at the gravity center, of
a build-up of Endon (element 200 in the Periodic Table).

When a sufficient amount of Endon aggregates, a photonic burst
sparks a great atomic explosion, engulfing an entire Galaxy and
creating a Super-Nova.[/QUOTE]?!?!?

[quote=lavalamp;179940]?!?!?[/quote]
I think he's having a Mally moment
(or maybe a couple of days worth)

:coffee:

The previous post is simply accurate cosmology.

[QUOTE=davar55;180085]The previous post is simply accurate cosmology.[/QUOTE]It's cosmology, Jim, but not as we know it.

Please post some references so that I can learn more about this topic.


Paul

[quote=xilman;180093]It's cosmology, (snip), but not as we know it.

Please post some references so that I can learn more about this topic.
QUOTE]

The unpublished reference is "A New Cosmology, Heart Of Reality".

Klingons on the starboard bow
 

[quote=xilman;180093]It's cosmology, Jim, but not as we know it.

Paul[/quote]

It's worse than that, he's dead Jim.

We come in peace,
shoot to kill.:rofl:

Ye cannae change the laws of physics.

[QUOTE=davar55;180099][quote=xilman;180093]It's cosmology, (snip), but not as we know it.

Please post some references so that I can learn more about this topic.
QUOTE]

The unpublished reference is "A New Cosmology, Heart Of Reality".[/QUOTE]By whom?

Google doesn't show anything.


Paul

[QUOTE=davar55;180099]The [b]unpublished[/b] reference is "A New Cosmology, Heart Of Reality".[/QUOTE]Perhaps there's a reason for that.