mersenneforum.org

mersenneforum.org (https://www.mersenneforum.org/index.php)
-   NFSNET Discussion (https://www.mersenneforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=17)
-   -   2^764P reached 100% (https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=5456)

NeoGen 2006-02-07 05:31

2^764P reached 100%
 
Another one bites the dust! :showoff:

I guess that soon the server will stop issuing lines to the sievers, even if it is necessary to go a bit beyond 100% it won't be much longer.

Is there another big number in queue for after this one finishes?

EDIT:
I know 2^764P is far from finished. I was just referring to the sieving part. :P

R.D. Silverman 2006-02-07 11:32

[QUOTE=NeoGen]Another one bites the dust! :showoff:

I guess that soon the server will stop issuing lines to the sievers, even if it is necessary to go a bit beyond 100% it won't be much longer.

Is there another big number in queue for after this one finishes?

EDIT:
I know 2^764P is far from finished. I was just referring to the sieving part. :P[/QUOTE]

I believe that 2,797+ (with GNFS) is next.

xilman 2006-02-07 12:54

[QUOTE=R.D. Silverman]I believe that 2,797+ (with GNFS) is next.[/QUOTE]Opinions are divided, even within the NFSNET admin team.

It's looking more likely that 2,1466L.c220 with SNFS will be next. I built the config files for that one a week or so ago and Richard is performing double checks on them for safety (he may already have finished).

I finished configuring sieving parameters for 2,797+ yesterday and turned the results over to Richard.


Paul

R.D. Silverman 2006-02-07 13:42

[QUOTE=xilman]Opinions are divided, even within the NFSNET admin team.

It's looking more likely that 2,1466L.c220 with SNFS will be next. I built the config files for that one a week or so ago and Richard is performing double checks on them for safety (he may already have finished).

I finished configuring sieving parameters for 2,797+ yesterday and turned the results over to Richard.


Paul[/QUOTE]


You had previously suggested that "only" 733 bits was too easy for NFSNET.

xilman 2006-02-07 18:21

[QUOTE=R.D. Silverman]You had previously suggested that "only" 733 bits was too easy for NFSNET.[/QUOTE]Yeah, we changed our minds.

Paul

R.D. Silverman 2006-02-09 14:07

[QUOTE=xilman]Yeah, we changed our minds.

Paul[/QUOTE]

Which one will you do? George Woltman has 2,797+ listed as
'reserved', so if you are not going to do it, you should release it
so someone else can.

Does anyone know what Franke & Co. are doing? Mayhaps working
on a kilobit factorization? They have been strangely quiet. :whistle:

The LA for 2,820+ will finish in 3 days and 2,815- is about 1/3 sieved.
2,833+ will be next. I have not decided what to do after that. Maybe
2,1017+.

xilman 2006-02-09 17:27

[QUOTE=R.D. Silverman]Which one will you do? George Woltman has 2,797+ listed as
'reserved', so if you are not going to do it, you should release it
so someone else can.

Does anyone know what Franke & Co. are doing? Mayhaps working
on a kilobit factorization? They have been strangely quiet. :whistle:

The LA for 2,820+ will finish in 3 days and 2,815- is about 1/3 sieved.
2,833+ will be next. I have not decided what to do after that. Maybe
2,1017+.[/QUOTE]Both. Sam has reserved both of them for us.

Paul

NeoGen 2006-02-09 20:48

My NFSNET client has recently started working on 2^1466L.

xilman 2006-02-09 21:35

[QUOTE=NeoGen]My NFSNET client has recently started working on 2^1466L.[/QUOTE]Good!

I learned from Richard this morning that he had started the changeover to the new project.

Paul

akruppa 2006-02-09 21:41

Btw, since I can't do any new factorisations on the cluster, please feel free to choose 3,479+ or 3,499+ for NFSNET if you like.

Alex


All times are UTC. The time now is 00:08.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.