![]() |
[QUOTE=grobie]I suffered a setback, I just bought a new box and 3 weeks later the hard drive crashed, its going to be replaced by dell, but for my k=1222853775, I lost all testing and sieve file from n=10k to 250k, I think my testing was at approx. 176K. My second box is still testing 250k to 300k.
Should I sieve & test from my last prime or start at 175k. All of the llrresults are gone also.[/QUOTE] Ok, hard drive installed, NewPGen is now sieving again from 175k to 250k |
Small update: still crunching on my 2 k's:shock:
|
I've run all the candidates for n=0-50k, added some more Ks, and
updated the table. My hope in expanding the range from 10k to 50k is that the candidates will be a little more predictable. |
Reserving k=317372055
|
Reserving 1501946985
|
Status of my search:
234686595 tested up to 135k=> 102 primes 360949875 tested up to 135k=> 100 primes |
reserving 555567045
|
555567045 is all yours - good luck!
|
Thanks!
Just two questions. Should I use LLR 362 or some other (once I'm done with sieving)? Is there a way I could find out how many digits candidate of the form k*2^n-1 has? Edo |
The number of digits is log base 10 of the number which comes out
to roughly 0.3*n. To get onto the top-5000 n must be at least 220k now. I'd stick with LLR 362 unless we find something reproducibly wrong with it. |
Thanks.
|
| All times are UTC. The time now is 15:48. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.