![]() |
25*2^587585-1 (176883 digits)
|
Nice one Cruelty!
226005*2^263957-1 (79465 digits) |
Thanks :smile:
I'm just trying not to stay far behind you and Kosmaj :showoff: |
22932195*2^406996-1 (122526 digits)
(I have 2 machines on this - one started at 300k, the other at 400k. Each machine found one pretty quick - 303k and this 406k. Hopefully some of the gaps will fill in...) |
2904473715*2^327844-1 (98701 digits)
|
247*2^952069-1 (286604 digits)
I started at n=400k for the low-weight k and hoped for 1 prime before 1M...it just made it :bounce: |
Great news! Who's gonna find the first 300k digits prime?
|
[B]Larry[/B], congrats on a nice and big prime! :w00t: :cool: We are now 11th by score!
[B]Cruelty[/B]: Cruel to composites, gentle to primes! :smile: Congrats on a nice k=25 prime! |
Guess who's #10 :smile:
BTW: it will take me some time to find a TOP-3 RPS prime now :sad: |
Time or luck. I reserved k=247 from n=400k back at the end of December.
It's a low-weight k so one machine was able to go from n=400k-1M in less than 2 months. |
How deep have you sieved your ranges for k=247, and what was the average number of candidates per 100k range of "n"? I'm just trying to compare it with my k=25, where I get 3800-4000 candidates per 100k range of "n" sieved till ~2T.
|
| All times are UTC. The time now is 21:22. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.