Vapochill LS
 

hey everyone!!! i just bought a Vapochill LS and i will be cranking up the speed out of my 3.2c to around 4.5ghz :showoff: and i will post some benchmarks!!!! :bounce:
I cant wait, if anyone else has some extreme overclocks or extreme cooling then please let us know. :banana:

PS: cant wait to :flex: this things muscle!!!

also, since i allready have a 3.2 northwood, i'm getting a 3.2 prescott and i'm having trouble deciding which one i should stick to my vapochill, i want to know which one is better for prime95, the 3.2 northwood overclocked or prescott overclocked. thanks

northwood prescot is a waste of cooling power and should have never become avaible to public.

[QUOTE=moo][B]northwood prescot [/B] is a waste of cooling power and should have never become avaible to public.[/QUOTE]
I think you mean simply "prescott", the core that replaced northwood...
In fact Prescott is good to warm your room in winter, and Northwood is definitely better for Prime95.
I have a 3,2GHz Northwood overclocked to 3.5 GHz (air cooled) and I would really like to know how far you will be able to go with Vapochill. Don´t forget that for really "serious" OC you should also keep an eye on the memories and the chipset, as they are also prone to heat a lot.

[QUOTE=lycorn]I think you mean simply "prescott", the core that replaced northwood...
In fact Prescott is good to warm your room in winter, and Northwood is definitely better for Prime95.
I have a 3,2GHz Northwood overclocked to 3.5 GHz (air cooled) and I would really like to know how far you will be able to go with Vapochill. Don´t forget that for really "serious" OC you should also keep an eye on the memories and the chipset, as they are also prone to heat a lot.[/QUOTE]

i know that i forgot a , and the and a and

northwood, the prescot is a waste of cooling and power and should have never become avaible to public.
Yesterday 02:17 PM

[QUOTE=moo]i know that i forgot a , and the and a and

northwood, the prescot is a waste of cooling and power and should have never become avaible to public.
Yesterday 02:17 PM[/QUOTE]

I understood what you meant, moo, although the punctuation helps!

Northwoods are better than Prescott in most ways if you have a choice. eg for throughput in P95 at identical speeds.

If I had such a cooler I would probably stick it on the northwood too.

ok i think i'll stick with the NW then and i'll stick the prescott in my older machine

Any benchies yet?

i will post benchies for a 3.2 or a 3.4 Northwood in a bout a few weeks.

my project has been set back a few weeks because my video card is not in stock right now but i decided finally to go for another 3.2c and it turns out that i got a 30 capacitor one so from what i hear its supposedly supposed to be an EE but something went wrong so they jsut sold it as a northwood so what this means that it might be a gallatin core but i doubt it but these chips overclock much better then the normal northwoods!!!!

Here is my unoverclocked bench mark

Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz
CPU speed: 3198.55 MHz
CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX, SSE, SSE2
L1 cache size: 8 KB
L2 cache size: 512 KB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 128 bytes
TLBS: 64
Prime95 version 23.8, RdtscTiming=1
Best time for 384K FFT length: 11.641 ms.
Best time for 448K FFT length: 13.863 ms.
Best time for 512K FFT length: 15.818 ms.
Best time for 640K FFT length: 18.956 ms.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 23.070 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 27.199 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 30.467 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 40.081 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 49.231 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 58.714 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 66.277 ms.

Now here is a benchmark from my older overclock

Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz
CPU speed: 3647.76 MHz
CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX, SSE, SSE2
L1 cache size: 8 KB
L2 cache size: 512 KB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 128 bytes
TLBS: 64
Prime95 version 23.8, RdtscTiming=1
Best time for 384K FFT length: 10.021 ms.
Best time for 448K FFT length: 11.924 ms.
Best time for 512K FFT length: 13.648 ms.
Best time for 640K FFT length: 16.404 ms.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 19.984 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 23.556 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 26.338 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 34.603 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 42.372 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 50.425 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 57.149 ms.

Now here is my benchmark from my new overclock using my Vapochill

Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz
CPU speed: 4000.24 MHz
CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX, SSE, SSE2
L1 cache size: 8 KB
L2 cache size: 512 KB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 128 bytes
TLBS: 64
Prime95 version 23.8, RdtscTiming=1
Best time for 384K FFT length: 8.993 ms.
Best time for 448K FFT length: 10.709 ms.
Best time for 512K FFT length: 12.282 ms.
Best time for 640K FFT length: 14.588 ms.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 17.823 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 21.062 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 23.482 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 30.757 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 37.927 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 45.061 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 50.789 ms.

That´s great results!
Have you played with anything other than the FSB frequency?
Now all you have to do is upgrading the client to version 24.12 and you´ll get even better timings :showoff:
Happy crunching!

Heres the new benchmark with the newer version of Prime95

Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz
CPU speed: 4000.25 MHz
CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, Prefetch, MMX, SSE, SSE2
L1 cache size: 8 KB
L2 cache size: 512 KB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 128 bytes
TLBS: 64
Prime95 32-bit version 24.13, RdtscTiming=1
Best time for 512K FFT length: 10.601 ms.
Best time for 640K FFT length: 13.683 ms.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 16.957 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 19.986 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 22.366 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 28.540 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 35.333 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 41.604 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 46.680 ms.
Best time for 2560K FFT length: 60.701 ms.
Best time for 3072K FFT length: 77.047 ms.
Best time for 3584K FFT length: 90.471 ms.
Best time for 4096K FFT length: 102.816 ms.

Best time for 58 bit trial factors: 7.238 ms.
Best time for 59 bit trial factors: 7.174 ms.
Best time for 60 bit trial factors: 7.235 ms.
Best time for 61 bit trial factors: 7.301 ms.
Best time for 62 bit trial factors: 7.873 ms.
Best time for 63 bit trial factors: 7.890 ms.
Best time for 64 bit trial factors: 9.635 ms.
Best time for 65 bit trial factors: 9.633 ms.
Best time for 66 bit trial factors: 9.563 ms.
Best time for 67 bit trial factors: 9.559 ms.

you gained .01 mhz wow ur close with that overclocking thing :w00t:

This reminds me of how much I hate my Newcastle core. blah :yucky:

Oh well, I guess I have good cooling but crappy processor for OCing. (hey, it was the best when I bought it w00t!)

3500+ Newcastle

And I actually bought a 2.66 GHz Northwood Pentium 4 just to run Prime95 on, and overclocked to 2.8 GHz using a stock Celeron heatsink w00t!

[QUOTE=CADavis]This reminds me of how much I hate my Newcastle core. blah :yucky:

3500+ Newcastle
[/QUOTE]
Use it for Trial Factoring. It smokes the P4s at that.
Using the 64-bit version of Prime95 for TF on that machine will give you excellent results, and TF is something that the project is definitely in need of.

the new benchmarks were meant for teh new version of Prime95, not that i overclocked it more.

[QUOTE=lycorn]Use it for Trial Factoring. It smokes the P4s at that.[/QUOTE]

You are right. I checked my benchmark results and noticed that my 2.2 GHz Athlon got about 5.5ms on the trial factors up to 61 bits, which is better than his 4 GHz Pentium 4! Thats pretty leet, but I want to stay on the Primality testing.

Edit:
Best time for 58 bit trial factors: 5.508 ms.
Best time for 59 bit trial factors: 5.517 ms.
Best time for 60 bit trial factors: 5.501 ms.
Best time for 61 bit trial factors: 5.527 ms.
Best time for 62 bit trial factors: 9.852 ms.
Best time for 63 bit trial factors: 9.831 ms.
Best time for 64 bit trial factors: 12.720 ms.
Best time for 65 bit trial factors: 12.656 ms.
Best time for 66 bit trial factors: 12.636 ms.
Best time for 67 bit trial factors: 12.657 ms.

So I installed Windows XP Pro x64.... here are my factoring benchmarks: (Same CPU and speed)

Prime95 64-bit version 24.13 :bow:
Best time for 58 bit trial factors: 3.476 ms. :banana:
Best time for 59 bit trial factors: 3.471 ms. :showoff:
Best time for 60 bit trial factors: 3.685 ms.
Best time for 61 bit trial factors: 3.807 ms.
Best time for 62 bit trial factors: 4.508 ms.
Best time for 63 bit trial factors: 4.883 ms.
Best time for 64 bit trial factors: 6.244 ms.
Best time for 65 bit trial factors: 7.402 ms.
Best time for 66 bit trial factors: 7.358 ms.
Best time for 67 bit trial factors: 7.332 ms.

:flex: :flex: :grin:

Congrats CADavis!!!!! thats amazing!!! i think i'm gonna upgrade to a dual-core in about a year or so and then we'll see who smokes who :flex: