![]() |
taking
3321934757 3321934783 3321934801 3321934831 to 78 bits |
taking 'cpu' already factored exponent to 75
|
[QUOTE=firejuggler;261234]taking 'cpu' already factored exponent to 75[/QUOTE]
OK, I will update the site as soon as your results start to appear on the "Report results" thread :smile: Good luck! Luigi |
Taking
3321935209 from 71 to 72 Grant. |
Factor=N/A,3321935263,72,75
Factor=N/A,3321935437,72,75 Factor=N/A,3321935581,72,75 |
Taking
3321935213 from 71 to 72 Grant. |
Applying my GT440 GPU to raise the floor, hope you don't mind, firejuggler...this will take at least a week....and I'm 3 assignments away from starting....
Factor=0,3321934757,78,80 Factor=0,3321934783,78,80 Factor=0,3321934801,78,80 Factor=0,3321934831,78,80 |
not at all, my machine is getting too hot these days.
|
Factor=N/A,3321928381,81,82
Factor=N/A,3321928417,81,82 Factor=N/A,3321928483,81,82 Factor=N/A,3321928601,81,82 |
The last 76 to 80 bit factoring previously reserved starts in a few hours...so time for a few more from 78 to 80. I assume 8-10 reservations are OK...at least as long as things aren't hopping...
Factor=0,3321934199,78,80 Factor=0,3321934193,78,80 Factor=0,3321934163,78,80 Factor=0,3321934129,78,80 Factor=0,3321934051,78,80 |
1 Attachment(s)
Having recently acquired a rather tasty Gigabyte SuperClocked GTX 560 Ti, I'm quite keen to see what it can do. :big grin:
Reserving these four exponents to experiment with. I'll definitely take them to 80 bits, probably take them to 81 bits and maybe take them to 82 bits. 3321933577 3321933613 3321933661 3321933679 I have been running tests on already factored exponents to make sure it finds all the factors, and so far it has, so I'm reasonably confident it won't miss any in unsearched ranges. Edit: Just to check, it's OK to run multiple instances of mfakt simultaneously (in separate folders) right? Currently I'm running 4 instances over 2 hyperthreaded CPU cores, that way I can get sieve primes nice and high (58,617 on all of them, wait times of 400 - 600 μs) while maintaining as high a throughput as possible on the GPU. Getting about 55 M/s for the rate on all four, ~220 M/s total, which is nice (I guess, I don't really know, but it's probably faster than I could test them by hand). |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 22:31. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.