Taking all (factored) 68 bits exponents to 69 bits.

Luigi

Taking
[code]
3321929971
3321930173
3321930211
3321930229
3321930323
3321930347
3321930349
3321930371
3321930397
3321930439
3321930461
3321930517
3321930617
3321930977
3321931043
3321931057
3321931099
3321931163
[/code]to 76 digits ( basically all the exponent without factor -to [URL]http://2721.hddkillers.com/graph/[/URL] - at 75 digits)

[QUOTE=firejuggler;250886]Taking
[code]
3321929971
3321930173
3321930211
3321930229
3321930323
3321930347
3321930349
3321930371
3321930397
3321930439
3321930461
3321930517
[COLOR="Red"]3321930617 <--- Do you mean 3321930613 ?[/COLOR]
3321930977
3321931043
3321931057
3321931099
3321931163
[/code]to 76 digits ( basically all the exponent without factor -to [URL]http://2721.hddkillers.com/graph/[/URL] - at 75 digits)[/QUOTE]

Am I right?

Also, are you going to add 3321934909,75,76 to your search?

Luigi

Yup. ( Yet another one bite.. er blunder)

taking
3321932869,
3321932567,
3321932491,
3321932359,
3321932161,
3321932143,
3321932123,
3321932111
to 77 (only those 8 right now)

Double checking ALL factored exponent to 70 bits ( and for some, bringing them from 69 to 70... using mfaktc)

That has already been done for the old range:
[url]http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=214046&postcount=404[/url]

It would be better to focus on getting the new range to the same level (or higher).

The first range was those less than 3321934000, and the new range is those 3321934000 to 3321935000.

I was told that this range was reserved for the slower CPU. As i'm using a GPU, i Ithough it might help to double check. So, the 'usefull work' would be to take the already factored between 3321934000 to 3321935000 to 75 bits?

Yes, perhaps I should have been more clear, I was only talking about factored exponents.

As far as I'm aware, only the [B]unfactored[/B] exponents in the new range are set aside for CPU testing, but taking the [B]factored[/B] exponents further is OK.

Double checking the progress on [B]unfactored[/B] exponents is a good idea too, and a couple of factors have been found that way, but the old range has been largely double checked already.

ok, then.
taking
[quote]
3321934069
3321934081
3321934211
3321934223
3321934237
3321934271
3321934391
3321934433
3321934463
3321934471
3321934591
3321934687
3321934739
3321934751
3321934769
3321934807
3321934817
3321934849
3321934907
3321934937
3321934097
3321934843
3321934403
3321934633
3321934709
3321934741
3321934579
(all the already factored in the new range)
[/quote]
to 75 bits ( This time I double checked, should haven't missed/added one.. Should I have, please tell me)

[QUOTE=firejuggler;251324]ok, then.
taking

to 75 bits ( This time I double checked, should haven't missed/added one.. Should I have, please tell me)[/QUOTE]

Ouch, I was doing the same! :smile:

I will let you do the double-check and extend the range of factored exponents up to 75, as your GPU is fster than mine.

Luigi