I would like to take M3321934003 from 71 to 72 bits. Using Factor 5

will take
[code]
3321934051,
3321934129,
3321934163,
3321934193,
3321934199,
3321934241,
3321934243,
3321934537,
3321934579,
3321934697
[/code]to 72 bit
edit : since its already done, to 73 bits. but i have other assignement atm so won't be as fast.

Not 3321934757 as well?

Didn't see it at [URL="http://home.earthlink.net/%7Eelevensmooth/Billion.htm"]http://home.earthlink.net/~elevensmooth/Billion.htm[/URL], but i'll take it to 73. is it at 71 or 72 right now?

After I posted, I saw that you'd already run it to 72 bits (twice?) and reported it in the [url=http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?p=250677]results thread[/url].

However, if it helps, both sets of stats (ElevenSmooth and More GIMPS) are [url=http://2721.hddkillers.com/compare/]largely in agreement[/url]. Here is [url=http://2721.hddkillers.com/graph/]a graph[/url] showing progress of unfactored billion digit exponents.

Note that your current work on running those exponents to 72 bits is not reflected, because wblipp and ET_ haven't had chance to update their respective websites yet.

This doesn't bother me. I know it need a bit of delay. i'll probably get those to 75 or beyond. But for now, I 'll get them to 73.

[QUOTE=firejuggler;250681]will take
[code]
...
[B]3321934579,[/B]
...
[/code]to [strike]72[/strike] 73 bit[/QUOTE]

You recently reported a factor for this one. Is this an oversight, or do you really want to continue this to a higher level?

oversight, thanks for the reminder.

[QUOTE=firejuggler;250700]This doesn't bother me. I know it need a bit of delay. i'll probably get those to 75 or beyond. But for now, I 'll get them to 73.[/QUOTE]I thought that 3321934003 and above was supposed to be a refuge for slower CPU's. And that the faster CPU's would take over at 75 bits and at some point above that GPU's would take bulk of the work load. With your GPU you should be able to move one of the ones at 75 to 77 in less than 3 hours.


<shameless pitch>
All of your cycles would be welcome at 100MDPP.
</shameless pitch>

I wasn't aware of that. I'll take 3321929929 to 76 bits and see how long it take. based on that, i'lll take a few more.

Taking M3321934471 from 68 bits to 69 bits.
(The Mersenne number already had a factor)

Luigi