[QUOTE=Rodrigo;228345]lavalamp,

Cool graph page there that you linked to!

I'm hoping that the page I used ( [URL]http://www.moregimps.it/billion/expo_i.php?id=bit_depth[/URL] ) is up to date, given that it's vacation season...

Rodrigo[/QUOTE]

It is, and will be until September 29th... :smile:

Luigi

[quote=ET_;228352]It is, and will be until September 29th... :smile:

Luigi[/quote]
Luigi,

Great to hear from you! :smile:

Just to make sure: Do you mean that it's vacation season till Sept. 29 -- or that the Idle Exponents Stats Page will be kept up to date till Sept. 29, and then chaos will reign? :nuke:

Rodrigo

[QUOTE=Rodrigo;228345]lavalamp,

Cool graph page there that you linked to![/QUOTE]Thanks, though it'll be a little clearer when the new candidates are TF'd to 71 bits and the y-axis can stretch its legs a bit more.

[QUOTE=Rodrigo;228362]and then chaos will reign? :nuke:[/QUOTE]Yes, sadly it was around this time last year that the [url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aY7XH2ulTEU]Helvetica scenario[/url] happened. *shudder*

[quote=lavalamp;228364]
Yes, sadly it was around this time last year that the [URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aY7XH2ulTEU"]Helvetica scenario[/URL] happened. *shudder*[/quote]

I checked out that link -- it's very good!! :missingteeth: Looks totally authentic.

Rodrigo

I will take 3321934783 from 62 to 71

Grant.

a new contributor from France
 

Hi,

I compute 3321934379 from 62 to 71

patrick


[size="1"][color="red"]reservation was changed by moderator to because patrick was confused[/color][/size]

Taking 3321934697 from 62 to 71.

i take 3321934129 from 2^62 to 2^71-1

[QUOTE=Pat83;230117]i take 3321934129 from 2^62 to 2^71-1[/QUOTE]

Pat - that exponent has already be tested to 71.

You should be able to check [URL="http://www.moregimps.it/billion/expo_a.php"]http://www.moregimps.it/billion/expo_a.php[/URL] (seems to be currently not available)
or at
[URL="http://home.earthlink.net/~elevensmooth/Billion.html"]http://home.earthlink.net/~elevensmooth/Billion.html[/URL]

Grant.

I'll take 3321934831 from 68 to 69.

[quote=gjmccrac;230124]Pat - that exponent has already be tested to 71.

You should be able to check [URL]http://www.moregimps.it/billion/expo_a.php[/URL] (seems to be currently not available)
or at
[URL]http://home.earthlink.net/~elevensmooth/Billion.html[/URL]

Grant.[/quote]

I'm sorry about all this.

am i rignt if i say each exponent existing on the list is taken by someone ?
so, if 3321934129 71 is already taken, am i right to say 3321934130 from 62 to 71 is free ?

i wait your response to take it.
thanks for the time

pat