mersenneforum.org

mersenneforum.org (https://www.mersenneforum.org/index.php)
-   Operation Billion Digits (https://www.mersenneforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=50)
-   -   Checkout Thread (https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=3211)

em99010pepe 2009-07-24 04:46

[quote=wblipp;182465]without progress?[/quote]

.

ET_ 2009-07-24 08:29

[QUOTE=em99010pepe;182478].[/QUOTE]

I will take 3321930011 from 72 up to 76

Luigi

Primeinator 2009-07-25 06:15

Luigi,

How exactly are you calculating the fractional value between each level of progress? I know how the leveling system works- each new level is an extra exponent to one higher bit level but I did not figure out how you got 11.03. I may not be an active participant in OBD, but it is something I follow with avid interest.

Edit: This was not the best place to put this question- that's what sleep deprivation will do to you!

ET_ 2009-07-25 08:22

[QUOTE=Primeinator;182664]Luigi,

How exactly are you calculating the fractional value between each level of progress? I know how the leveling system works- each new level is an extra exponent to one higher bit level but I did not figure out how you got 11.03. I may not be an active participant in OBD, but it is something I follow with avid interest.

Edit: This was not the best place to put this question- that's what sleep deprivation will do to you![/QUOTE]

IIRC, 11.03 is not to be considered "fractional", it should be read "Level 11 plus 3 exponents taken to the next bit depth".

Luigi

lavalamp 2009-07-25 11:29

Getting another candidate to the previous bit level counts for 1 of the sublevels too.

Primeinator 2009-07-25 12:46

[QUOTE=ET_;182675]IIRC, 11.03 is not to be considered "fractional", it should be read "Level 11 plus 3 exponents taken to the next bit depth".

Luigi[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=lavalamp;182693]Getting another candidate to the previous bit level counts for 1 of the sublevels too.[/QUOTE]

Ah, okay. Thanks.

lavalamp 2009-07-26 11:24

These have all been taken to 76 bits with no facors so far, taking them to 77 bits now:

3321932969
3321933007
3321933047
3321933089
3321933113
3321933179
3321933193
3321933233
3321933253
3321933289
3321933313

lavalamp 2009-08-18 20:47

These are all at 77 bits with no factors, unreserving:

3321932969
3321933007
3321933047
3321933089
3321933113
3321933179
3321933193
3321933233
3321933253
3321933289
3321933313

And now I'd like to take 3321929617 to 75 bits, and all of the following ten from 77 to 78 bits:

3321933337
3321933361
3321933367
3321933389
3321933451
3321933541
3321933551
3321933577
3321933613
3321933661

ET_ 2009-08-19 09:58

Taking 3321931777 from 75 to 76 bits.

Luigi

lavalamp 2009-08-23 07:17

3321929617 taken to 75 bits, no factors, unreserving.

3321933337 taken to 78 bits, no factors, unreserving.

With these two results, the average depth of all the unfactored candidates is now [B]exactly[/B] 2^76.

Couldn't have planned it better. :big grin:

[code]Bits num culminative
78 3 3
77 21 24
76 24 48
75 60 108[/code]

storm5510 2009-08-24 05:47

3,321.929,617. Sorry for the comma's. My eyes are not so good. I wanted to see how many digits there was.

Is everyone here pulling these out of the air? How are you determining these are prime in the basic sense?


All times are UTC. The time now is 22:51.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.