![]() |
no factor for M3321928927 from 2^83 to 2^84 [mfakto 0.11-Win mfakto_cl_barrett92_4]
|
no factor for M3321929563 from 2^83 to 2^84 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett92_mul32]
no factor for M3321929843 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett79_mul32] no factor for M3321929843 from 2^76 to 2^77 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett79_mul32] no factor for M3321929843 from 2^77 to 2^78 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett79_mul32] no factor for M3321929843 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett79_mul32] no factor for M3321929843 from 2^79 to 2^80 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321930769 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett79_mul32] no factor for M3321930769 from 2^76 to 2^77 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett79_mul32] M3321930769 has a factor: 186451145279882964890777 [TF:77:78:mfaktc 0.18 barrett79_mul32] found 1 factor for M3321930769 from 2^77 to 2^78 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett79_mul32] no factor for M3321930769 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett79_mul32] no factor for M3321930769 from 2^79 to 2^80 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett92_mul32] The factor is composite and known from before. I did these two last expose (from ^1 to ^80), because they have many known factors and I wanted to make sure that mfatktc works ok running multiple instances as lavalamp suggested. They have been done before from ^1 to ^75 so I am just reporting the results from ^75 to ^80. |
[QUOTE=aketilander;301142]no factor for M3321928963 from 2^83 to 2^84 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett92_mul32][/QUOTE]
no factor for M3321929197 from 2^83 to 2^84 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett92_mul32] |
no factor for M3321929209 from 2^83 to 2^84 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett92_mul32]
|
no factor for M3321929573 from 2^83 to 2^84 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett92_mul32]
|
no factor for M3321929621 from 2^83 to 2^84 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett92_mul32]
|
no factor for M3321930401 from 2^79 to 2^80 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett92_mul32]
no factor for M3321930401 from 2^80 to 2^81 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321930401 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321930401 from 2^82 to 2^83 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321930401 from 2^83 to 2^84 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett92_mul32] |
[QUOTE=aketilander;302071]no factor for M3321930401 from 2^79 to 2^80 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett92_mul32]
no factor for M3321930401 from 2^80 to 2^81 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321930401 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321930401 from 2^82 to 2^83 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett92_mul32] no factor for M3321930401 from 2^83 to 2^84 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett92_mul32][/QUOTE] Are you still going to take it to 85? :smile: Luigi |
[QUOTE=ET_;302075]Are you still going to take it to 85? :smile:
Luigi[/QUOTE] Yes continuing to 85 now. (just making sure I did also DC it from ^1 to ^79) |
no factor for M3321929789 from 2^83 to 2^84 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett92_mul32]
|
no factor for M3321929701 from 2^83 to 2^84 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett92_mul32]
|
| All times are UTC. The time now is 22:43. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.