![]() |
[QUOTE=Christenson;262181]More temptation then:
[/QUOTE] Christenson, Hmm, very interesting, thanks! I want to look some more into this. Maybe we should take this thread over to Hardware/GPU Computing before the Forum Gods suggest that we're off-topic... Rodrigo |
no factor for M3321934537 from 2^76 to 2^77 [mfaktc 0.17 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321934537 from 2^77 to 2^78 [mfaktc 0.17 barrett79_mul32] no factor for M3321934537 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.17 barrett79_mul32] no factor for M3321934537 from 2^79 to 2^80 [mfaktc 0.17 barrett92_mul32] (wish I had a factor to report....) |
no factor for M3321934003 from 2^79 to 2^80 [mfaktc 0.16p1-Win barrett92_mul32]
Releasing it |
no factor for M3321934607 from 2^76 to 2^77 [mfaktc 0.17 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321934607 from 2^77 to 2^78 [mfaktc 0.17 barrett79_mul32] no factor for M3321934607 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.17 barrett79_mul32] no factor for M3321934607 from 2^79 to 2^80 [mfaktc 0.17 barrett92_mul32] |
Unfortunately:
no factor for M3321934697 from 2^76 to 2^77 [mfaktc 0.17 barrett79_mul32] no factor for M3321934697 from 2^77 to 2^78 [mfaktc 0.17 barrett79_mul32] no factor for M3321934697 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.17 barrett79_mul32] no factor for M3321934697 from 2^79 to 2^80 [mfaktc 0.17 barrett92_mul32] (All unfactored GPU exponents are up to 78 bits now) |
no factor for M3321934757 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.17 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321934757 from 2^79 to 2^80 [mfaktc 0.17 barrett92_mul32] I'm gonna celebrate the first one I find!!!! |
M3321936361 factored from 60.000 bits to 71.000 bits,
and it has a factor: 924868354347418664233. Rodrigo |
These four have been taken to 82 bits with no factor:
3321933577 3321933613 3321933661 3321933679 However, I'm gonna take them an extra level to 83 bits. Edit: I hope no-one takes any more candidates to 82 bits. When firejuggler finishes his current batch, it'll be just two more to 82 bits to finish the level, and I have a strange neurosis that makes me want to see two levels rounded out at the same time (including taking the last couple of candidates from 82 to 83 bits before doing 81 to 82 bits (simultaneously of course) :geek:). I'm just throwing this out there, I hope everyone else has this same weird desire, or at least doesn't mind indulging me. |
no factor for M3321934783 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.17 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321934783 from 2^79 to 2^80 [mfaktc 0.17 barrett92_mul32] Lavalamp, I'm OK with you going simultaneously to 82 and 83 bits as long as there is stuff below 81 bits for me to keep raising the floor on...which will take me at least a month. |
[QUOTE=Christenson;263442]Lavalamp, I'm OK with you going simultaneously to 82 and 83 bits as long as there is stuff below 81 bits for me to keep raising the floor on...which will take me at least a month.[/QUOTE]Maybe if the big buys grab those that are the lowest and move them up to the goal bit level for the level being worked on.
See: [url]http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=251199&postcount=542[/url] |
M3321934951 has no factor from 79 to 80
|
| All times are UTC. The time now is 23:03. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.