mersenneforum.org

mersenneforum.org (https://www.mersenneforum.org/index.php)
-   Operation Billion Digits (https://www.mersenneforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=50)
-   -   Report Results Here (https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=3210)

ET_ 2011-04-08 08:59

[QUOTE=firejuggler;257916]no factor for M3321928241 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.16-Win barrett92_mul32]
( second exponent is running-third will be even later)[/QUOTE]

You didn't reserve them, did you? :smile:

Luigi

firejuggler 2011-04-08 13:11

course i did.. well, i ...
shoot i didnt...
Factor=N/A,3321928319,81,82
Factor=N/A,3321928373,81,82
consider those 2 reserved. ( will repeat that in checkout)

Rodrigo 2011-04-08 16:36

[QUOTE=Rodrigo;257792]Factor4 has found two factors for 3321936227 in the first couple of hours. Should I report them, stop work on this exponent, and move on to the next one? Or should I keep working on 3321936227 to 71 bits as planned, and then report?

Rodrigo[/QUOTE]
OK, since nobody has objected to stopping work on this exponent, I'll stop it, report, and move on to the next one.

M3321936227 has a factor: 11931392798882400911
M3321936227 has a factor: 23064505181420161847

Factoring work stopped at 68.472 bit depth.

Rodrigo

Uncwilly 2011-04-09 00:42

[QUOTE=Rodrigo;257948]M3321936227 has a factor: 11931392798882400911
M3321936227 has a factor: 23064505181420161847

Factoring work stopped at 68.472 bit depth.[/QUOTE]
Trial-factoring M3321936227 in [2^68, 2^69-1]
M3321936227 has 0 factors in [2^68, 2^69-1].

Rodrigo 2011-04-09 04:48

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;257977]Trial-factoring M3321936227 in [2^68, 2^69-1]
M3321936227 has 0 factors in [2^68, 2^69-1].[/QUOTE]
For future reference -- should I have gone on to 69 bits (or more)? Don't wanna create more work for others...

Rodrigo

Uncwilly 2011-04-09 15:51

[QUOTE=Rodrigo;257987]For future reference -- should I have gone on to 69 bits (or more)? Don't wanna create more work for others...[/QUOTE][U]Generally[/U] you should just finish a bit level. You could have reported to 68 and no one would have been the wiser. :wink:

Rodrigo 2011-04-10 05:41

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;258011][U]Generally[/U] you should just finish a bit level. You could have reported to 68 and no one would have been the wiser. :wink:[/QUOTE]
Ah, OK, thanks! Will keep that in mind for the next time.

Rodrigo

firejuggler 2011-04-10 10:56

no factor for M3321928319 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.16-Win barrett92_mul32]

firejuggler 2011-04-13 02:17

no factor for M3321928373 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.16-Win barrett92_mul32]

M0CZY 2011-04-13 09:25

M3321935017
 
I have factored M3321935017 from 71 to 72 bits, using Factor 5. Here is the result file:-
M3321935017 has 0 factors in [2^71, 2^72-1].
I won't be doing any more work on this exponent.

Aillas 2011-04-14 13:40

no factor for M3321934003 from 2^73 to 2^74 [mfaktc 0.16p1-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321934003 from 2^74 to 2^75 [mfaktc 0.16p1-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321934003 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.16p1-Win barrett79_mul32]

still woking on it


All times are UTC. The time now is 23:04.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.