![]() |
[QUOTE=firejuggler;257916]no factor for M3321928241 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.16-Win barrett92_mul32]
( second exponent is running-third will be even later)[/QUOTE] You didn't reserve them, did you? :smile: Luigi |
course i did.. well, i ...
shoot i didnt... Factor=N/A,3321928319,81,82 Factor=N/A,3321928373,81,82 consider those 2 reserved. ( will repeat that in checkout) |
[QUOTE=Rodrigo;257792]Factor4 has found two factors for 3321936227 in the first couple of hours. Should I report them, stop work on this exponent, and move on to the next one? Or should I keep working on 3321936227 to 71 bits as planned, and then report?
Rodrigo[/QUOTE] OK, since nobody has objected to stopping work on this exponent, I'll stop it, report, and move on to the next one. M3321936227 has a factor: 11931392798882400911 M3321936227 has a factor: 23064505181420161847 Factoring work stopped at 68.472 bit depth. Rodrigo |
[QUOTE=Rodrigo;257948]M3321936227 has a factor: 11931392798882400911
M3321936227 has a factor: 23064505181420161847 Factoring work stopped at 68.472 bit depth.[/QUOTE] Trial-factoring M3321936227 in [2^68, 2^69-1] M3321936227 has 0 factors in [2^68, 2^69-1]. |
[QUOTE=Uncwilly;257977]Trial-factoring M3321936227 in [2^68, 2^69-1]
M3321936227 has 0 factors in [2^68, 2^69-1].[/QUOTE] For future reference -- should I have gone on to 69 bits (or more)? Don't wanna create more work for others... Rodrigo |
[QUOTE=Rodrigo;257987]For future reference -- should I have gone on to 69 bits (or more)? Don't wanna create more work for others...[/QUOTE][U]Generally[/U] you should just finish a bit level. You could have reported to 68 and no one would have been the wiser. :wink:
|
[QUOTE=Uncwilly;258011][U]Generally[/U] you should just finish a bit level. You could have reported to 68 and no one would have been the wiser. :wink:[/QUOTE]
Ah, OK, thanks! Will keep that in mind for the next time. Rodrigo |
no factor for M3321928319 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.16-Win barrett92_mul32]
|
no factor for M3321928373 from 2^81 to 2^82 [mfaktc 0.16-Win barrett92_mul32]
|
M3321935017
I have factored M3321935017 from 71 to 72 bits, using Factor 5. Here is the result file:-
M3321935017 has 0 factors in [2^71, 2^72-1]. I won't be doing any more work on this exponent. |
no factor for M3321934003 from 2^73 to 2^74 [mfaktc 0.16p1-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321934003 from 2^74 to 2^75 [mfaktc 0.16p1-Win barrett79_mul32] no factor for M3321934003 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.16p1-Win barrett79_mul32] still woking on it |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 23:04. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.