[QUOTE=Rodrigo;253172]OK, some strange results here:
M3321936043 has a factor: 2017883321022948023
M3321936043 no factor from 60.000 bits to 71.000 bits.

So, which is it -- factor, or no factor?

The only unusual thing (well, maybe not so unusual for our area) is that the power went out for a while, while the computer was busy crunching that exponent, and I had to resume (-r) from where it was. The factor had already been reported at that point.

Rodrigo[/QUOTE]

Too bad it was not on the current list of exponents to test :(

Luigi

[QUOTE=ET_;253503]
Congratulations on your new factor!

Luigi[/QUOTE]
Thanks, Luigi!

Rodrigo

[QUOTE=ET_;253504]Too bad it was not on the current list of exponents to test :(

Luigi[/QUOTE]
Luigi,

This was in a new range that Uncwilly made available to me as the current range started to run out of suitable exponents for older machines. (See Post #512 in thr checkout thread.)

If there is anything else that I need to do in order to make this reservation official, please do let me know!

Rodrigo

[QUOTE=Rodrigo;253507]Luigi,

This was in a new range that Uncwilly made available to me as the current range started to run out of suitable exponents for older machines. (See Post #512 in thr checkout thread.)

If there is anything else that I need to do in order to make this reservation official, please do let me know!

Rodrigo[/QUOTE]

I'm trying to keep data coherent, even if ranges have not been released.
I will add your result to my OBD file (the one I got from Uncwilly) hoping that no one else will experiment out of the released ranges :smile:

Luigi

finally done. no good news i'm afraid
[quote]
no factor for M3321930011 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.15-Win barret79_mul32]
no factor for M3321930211 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.15-Win barret79_mul32]
no factor for M3321930229 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.15-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321930323 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.15-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321930347 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.15-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321930349 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.15-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321930371 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.15-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321930397 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.15-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321930439 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321930461 from 2^77 to 2^78 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321930461 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321930517 from 2^77 to 2^78 [mfaktc 0.14 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321930517 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.14 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321930613 from 2^77 to 2^78 [mfaktc 0.14 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321930613 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.14 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321930977 from 2^77 to 2^78 [mfaktc 0.15-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321930977 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.15-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321931043 from 2^77 to 2^78 [mfaktc 0.15-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321931043 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.15-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321931057 from 2^77 to 2^78 [mfaktc 0.14 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321931057 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.14 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321931099 from 2^77 to 2^78 [mfaktc 0.14 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321931099 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.14 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321931163 from 2^77 to 2^78 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321931163 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321931433 from 2^77 to 2^78 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321931433 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321931513 from 2^77 to 2^78 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321931513 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.14 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321931531 from 2^77 to 2^78 [mfaktc 0.14 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321931531 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.15 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321931601 from 2^77 to 2^78 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321931601 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.14-Win barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321931619 from 2^77 to 2^78 [mfaktc 0.14 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321931619 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.14 barrett79_mul32]
[/quote]

[QUOTE=firejuggler;253824]finally done. no good news i'm afraid[/QUOTE]

Why are you afraid? Because of no factor? You'll need on average ~78 single bitlevel attemps for just one factor. A rough estimate for a factor of n bits size is 1/n.


[CODE]no factor for M3321930011 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.15-Win barret79_mul32]
no factor for M3321930211 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.15-Win barret79_mul32][/CODE]
I'm more afraid about those two lines, did you edit them manually? Kernel name is wrong!

Oliver

yup i did, sorry about that.
I did run them, but didn't find it back in my log... so i edited it manually.

[CODE]no factor for M3321932111 from 2^77 to 2^78 [mfaktc 0.16-pre3 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321932111 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.16-pre3 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321932111 from 2^79 to 2^80 [mfaktc 0.16-pre3 barrett92_mul32]
no factor for M3321932111 from 2^80 to 2^81 [mfaktc 0.16-pre3 barrett92_mul32]
no factor for M3321932123 from 2^77 to 2^78 [mfaktc 0.16-pre3 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321932123 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.16-pre3 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321932123 from 2^79 to 2^80 [mfaktc 0.16-pre3 barrett92_mul32]
no factor for M3321932123 from 2^80 to 2^81 [mfaktc 0.16-pre3 barrett92_mul32]
no factor for M3321932143 from 2^77 to 2^78 [mfaktc 0.16-pre3 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321932143 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.16-pre3 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M3321932143 from 2^79 to 2^80 [mfaktc 0.16-pre3 barrett92_mul32]
no factor for M3321932143 from 2^80 to 2^81 [mfaktc 0.16-pre3 barrett92_mul32]
[/CODE]

Oliver

0.16? hmmm ^^ ...
still in beta?

[QUOTE=firejuggler;253971]still in beta?[/QUOTE]

Guess what the -preX string want to tell you. :yucky:
I'm done with the major changes for 0.16, currently it is in the testing stage.
Actually this was my first real run with 0.16.

Teaser: a little bit faster for both barrett kernels and a refurbished console output. :smile:

Oliver

Finished 3321934783 and 3321934831 to 73 bits, no factors, unreserving.