M3321934951 from 77 to 78 has no factor.

M3321934757 no factor from 62.000 bits to 71.000 bits.

Rodrigo

[QUOTE=lavalamp;236990]Does that mean 3321934757 to 71 bits?

You also still have 3321934207 and 3321934307 [URL="http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=231769&postcount=507"]reserved from 71 to 73 bits[/URL].[/QUOTE]
lavalamp,

Yes, and that's right. :smile:

Sorry I didn't see your post before. I'll subscribe to this thread so that I don't miss 'em in the future.

I'm moving on to 3321934207 now. After finishing these two commitments, I'll be limiting my OBD PC to lower bit levels (no higher than 72).

Rodrigo

Coo', now you've run 3321934757 to 71, it should put the scale on [url=http://2721.hddkillers.com/graph/]the graph[/url] back to something approaching sensible. 34px / bit level rather than 20px.

I also notice [url=http://2721.hddkillers.com/compare/]the stats[/url] have diverged again. I don't see where The Judger finished 3321929927, but if he indeed has done so as the moregimps site reflects, then another level has fallen.

[QUOTE=lavalamp;238663]Coo', now you've run 3321934757 to 71, it should put the scale on [URL="http://2721.hddkillers.com/graph/"]the graph[/URL] back to something approaching sensible. 34px / bit level rather than 20px.[/QUOTE]
lavalamp,

Pretty neat visual representation, that graph! I understand now how my unfinished exponent was keeping things out of whack.

Rodrigo

[QUOTE=lavalamp;238663]Coo', now you've run 3321934757 to 71, it should put the scale on [url=http://2721.hddkillers.com/graph/]the graph[/url] back to something approaching sensible. 34px / bit level rather than 20px.

I also notice [url=http://2721.hddkillers.com/compare/]the stats[/url] have diverged again. I don't see where The Judger finished 3321929927, but if he indeed has done so as the moregimps site reflects, then another level has fallen.[/QUOTE]

TheJudger finished his exponent last week. He sent me his results by mail.

Luigi

3321934709
 

The discovery of the factor 378121774679999658041.

Rodrigo said there was no factor.
Gjmccrac noticed the new factor rerunning Factor5.
Rodrigo looked back on his results file and found the factor he didn't notice before.

The factor was "found" by Rodrigo, but "discovered" by gjmccrac.

Who is the real owner of the factor? :smile:

Luigi

[QUOTE=ET_;238707]The discovery of the factor 378121774679999658041.
Who is the real owner of the factor? :smile:
[/QUOTE]

Give credit to Rodrigo - he had it checked out.

Grant.

[QUOTE=lavalamp;238663]Coo', now you've run 3321934757 to 71, it should put the scale on [url=http://2721.hddkillers.com/graph/]the graph[/url] back to something approaching sensible. 34px / bit level rather than 20px.

I also notice [url=http://2721.hddkillers.com/compare/]the stats[/url] have diverged again. I don't see where The Judger finished 3321929927, but if he indeed has done so as the moregimps site reflects, then another level has fallen.[/QUOTE]

We still need a factor to 82...

Luigi

[code]
no factor for M3321934937 from 2^68 to 2^69 [mfaktc 0.10-Win 71bit_mul24]
no factor for M3321934223 from 2^68 to 2^69 [mfaktc 0.10-Win 71bit_mul24]
no factor for M3321934751 from 2^68 to 2^69 [mfaktc 0.10-Win 71bit_mul24]
no factor for M3321934739 from 2^68 to 2^69 [mfaktc 0.10-Win 71bit_mul24]
no factor for M3321934237 from 2^68 to 2^69 [mfaktc 0.10-Win 71bit_mul24]
[/code]

:smile:

Luigi

[QUOTE=ET_;238711]We still need a factor to 82...[/QUOTE]I'm not sure what you mean. The target for level 15 was to get 15 candidates to 81 bits which is now done and so level 15 is completed.

For level 16, one more candidate needs to be lifted to 81 bits, and then all 16 of them taken to 82 bits (unless one or more are factored of course, but then others must take their place).