![]() |
[QUOTE=gjmccrac;229949]Thanks - I had not noticed the discrepancy in the letter.
:smile:[/QUOTE] It's hard to see. I checked all the digits of the factors looking for differences before I spotted the j / i difference. The ElevenSmooth site is now consistent with "j". William |
It's great to see stirrings of life!
@Uncwilly -- fabulous sign!! Rodrigo |
My first exponent
Factoring M3321934379 from 2^63 to 2^69 : no factor found.
|
[QUOTE=Pat83;230063]Factoring M3321934379 from 2^63 to 2^69 : no factor found.[/QUOTE]
The range 2^62 through 2^63 is still untested. This is my fault - I told you be email to begin at 2^63, but I should have said 2^62. Will you stop here or continue to higher levels with this numberr? William |
[quote=wblipp;230074]The range 2^62 through 2^63 is still untested.
This is my fault - I told you be email to begin at 2^63, but I should have said 2^62. Will you stop here or continue to higher levels with this numberr? William[/quote] ok, I restart the perforl like this : 2^62 to 2^69 then 2^62 to 2^71 is it ok for you ? |
[QUOTE=Pat83;230075]ok, I restart the perforl like this : 2^62 to 2^69 then 2^62 to 2^71
is it ok for you ?[/QUOTE] Since it's such a small range and easy to run, I just tested it for you. ("Factoring M3321934379 from 2^62 to 2^63, No factor found") No factors. The 2^62 to 2^63 range is now done. You would have only needed to run 2^62 to 2^63, not the whole 2^62 to 2^69 range. If you want to continue it to 2^71, you can now run 2^69 to 2^71. |
[quote=Mini-Geek;230085]Since it's such a small range and easy to run, I just tested it for you. ("Factoring M3321934379 from 2^62 to 2^63, No factor found") No factors. The 2^62 to 2^63 range is now done.
You would have only needed to run 2^62 to 2^63, not the whole 2^62 to 2^69 range. If you want to continue it to 2^71, you can now run 2^69 to 2^71.[/quote] waou ! ! ! it's not easy to follow you ! ok for the range 2^62 to 2^63 and 2^69 to 2^71. if it is not correct, i wouldn't be able to continue like this. |
M3321934783 has no factor in [2^62, 2^71-1].
Grant |
[quote=Mini-Geek;230085]Since it's such a small range and easy to run, I just tested it for you. ("Factoring M3321934379 from 2^62 to 2^63, No factor found") No factors. The 2^62 to 2^63 range is now done.
You would have only needed to run 2^62 to 2^63, not the whole 2^62 to 2^69 range. If you want to continue it to 2^71, you can now run 2^69 to 2^71.[/quote] so, M3321934379 2^62 to 2^63 have no fctor but M3321934379 2^69 to 2^71 return message segmentation fault |
[QUOTE=Pat83;230116]so, M3321934379 2^62 to 2^63 have no fctor
but M3321934379 2^69 to 2^71 return message segmentation fault[/QUOTE] I tested it on my Windows 7 64 bit and gave me no error. Would you mind sending your resume and results logfiles to me, so that I will be able to check what may be wrong? Luigi |
M3321934831 has 0 factors in [2^68, 2^69-1].
|
| All times are UTC. The time now is 22:59. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.