mersenneforum.org

mersenneforum.org (https://www.mersenneforum.org/index.php)
-   Hardware (https://www.mersenneforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   More RAM = Speedup?? (https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=2678)

dave_0273 2004-06-21 03:18

More RAM = Speedup??
 
Ok, before I start, I would just like to say sorry for the stupid question. I am new to computer hardware, I have always just got someone else to build my computers for me but now it is time for me to learn myself.

Ok, now onto the actual question. I have just bought a really cheap second hand computer. It is a celeron 400mhz. However, it only has 32mb of RAM in it. When I took in the task manager, it shows that it is using about 70mb of RAM. I am assuming that it is using up the 32mb of 'actual' RAM and having to use about 38mb of 'virtual' memory.

My question is, if I was to buy more RAM for this computer, would I see a significant speed increase on this computer. I own a P3 500mhz and it runs HEAPS faster than this computer and the only thing that I can think of is that it has a huge slowdown seeing it has to use 'virtual' memory.

So I think that I have rambled on for long enough now so I am going to leave it at that. Any input/suggestions/help would be much appreciated.

(I am just so used to putting gobs of memory in my computers so that they can soley do p-1 tests that I have never run into this problem before).

sdbardwick 2004-06-21 05:01

Your conclusion is correct; 32MB of RAM on a Windows 9x (or higher) machine would be horribly slow. I cannot recall ever running Win9x on less than 64MB. Upping the RAM to even 128MB would be a night and day difference.

Of course, if you wanted to torture sombody, you could force them to use Word95 on a Win95 machine with 32MB of RAM; even opening the File menu could take a few seconds.:razz:

On a more esoteric note, some computers, especially low-end HP, IBM, and Compaq, will only accept genuine PC66 SDRAM (sometimes PC100 will work also) in specific chip configurations; using newer PC133 won't be accepted by those annoying computers.

dave_0273 2004-06-21 13:09

Well, i have upped it to 128mb and it seems to be running faster now. What do you mean by windows 9x??

sdbardwick 2004-06-21 13:50

Let x=5 or let x=8 :smile:

smh 2004-06-21 14:30

[QUOTE=sdbardwick]Let x=5 or let x=8 :smile:[/QUOTE]

or x=ME :whistle:

Uncwilly 2004-06-21 16:54

but x<>XP AND x<>NT AND x<>2K

geoff 2004-06-22 08:00

[QUOTE=dave_0273]It is a celeron 400mhz. However, it only has 32mb of RAM in it.[/QUOTE]

My suggestion would be to install a minimal Linux system. Linux will run fine in 32MB, (I have an old P120 with 24MB that runs diskless). You could do stage one P-1 on this machine and then move the save file to another machine with more memory to do stage two.

optim 2004-06-23 02:23

128MB or Linux
 
I would suggest either having a minimum of 128MB for Windows machines or installing Linux (Debian Linux will probably work fine, see [url]www.debian.org[/url] ).

Pablo the Duck 2004-06-23 05:15

For a low memory machine I reckon Slackware is as good as anything - especially if you don't bother installing a window manager.


All times are UTC. The time now is 00:13.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.