[QUOTE=Prime95;556579][QUOTE=James Heinrich;556566][c]Test > Status...[/c] dialog... ETA for all the Cert work is exactly the same.[/QUOTE]I'll see if I can't to better for build 6.[/QUOTE]Much better in 30.3b6, thank you.

Much to my dismay, I accidentally re-ran a PRP on [M]107972569[/M] that I had already completed with proof now verified. Prime95 will not upload the second proof file. Instead, it throws error 409, proof already uploaded. My guess is this is working as intended to save space and prevent redundant computations sever side, but I thought it might be worth posting since I doubt anyone else has made the same dumb mistake that I did. Thanks!

This is probably going to be off-topic, but I don't know where else to put it. I am having a difficulty with [I]mprime[/I] and I suspect it may have something to do with my recent forced update to Windows 10 v2004. This is for the latest [I]mprime[/I] build. I am trying to run it with Ubuntu on Windows. In the past, I have been able to get it started like so:

[QUOTE]sudo ./mprime -d[/QUOTE]Using "sudo" has something to do with permissions which I don't know how to set. If I don't use it then I get a permission denied message. I get the following result:

[QUOTE]sudo ./mprime: command not found.[/QUOTE]I know I am in the right folder because I can give it a "ls" command and I can see the binary is there. I know my password is correct because I tried one which was incorrect and it refused.

I really don't know where to go with this... :confused:

Win some, lose some
 

[QUOTE=kriesel;556700]For v30.3b5, same applies to Windows Vista Business 32-bit on Pentium M 2GB ram.
And XP 32 bit on Pentium M 2GB ram says it is not a valid Win32 application.
Will retry with b6 when time allows.[/QUOTE]
V30.3build 6 resolved:
[URL="https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=556666&postcount=268"]..EXA issue[/URL], on both Vista Home Basic 64 bit and Vista Business 32 bit.

V30.3build 6 did not resolve:
Prime95 failure to launch on Windows XP 32bit. (v29.8b6 runs fine there.)

[QUOTE=storm5510;556859]I know I am in the right folder because I can give it a "ls" command and I can see the binary is there.[/QUOTE]

Would you mind posting the result of [c]ls -lah[/c] in that folder? Maybe it's a issue of rights. Normally, mprime should not need root privileges (i.e. "sudo").

[QUOTE=storm5510;556859]Using "sudo" has something to do with permissions which I don't know how to set. If I don't use it then I get a permission denied message. [/QUOTE]

I'm guessing [C]mprime[/C] doesn't have "execute" permission. I'm also guessing mprime's owner is not your login account.

If you do [C]ls -l[/C] and paste it here, we can confirm.

Use [C]sudo chown[/C] to change the ownership of the files in that folder. And [C]chmod[/C] to set the execute bit for [C]mprime[/C]

[QUOTE=kriesel;556861]
V30.3build 6 did not resolve:
Prime95 failure to launch on Windows XP 32bit. (v29.8b6 runs fine there.)[/QUOTE]

Same "KERNEL32.dll!K32GetModuleFileNameExA" error message?

[QUOTE=Prime95;556875]Same "KERNEL32.dll!K32GetModuleFileNameExA" error message?[/QUOTE]No, completely separate. [QUOTE=kriesel;556700]For v30.3b5
...
And XP 32 bit on Pentium M 2GB ram says it is not a valid Win32 application.
Will retry with b6 when time allows.[/QUOTE]Here's what it looks like, and v29.8b6 on the same system.
(Old slow system, low priority, but there it is. I have older...)

[QUOTE=Runtime Error;556856]Much to my dismay, I accidentally re-ran a PRP on [M]107972569[/M] that I had already completed with proof now verified. Prime95 will not upload the second proof file. Instead, it throws error 409, proof already uploaded. My guess is this is working as intended to save space and prevent redundant computations sever side, but I thought it might be worth posting since I doubt anyone else has made the same dumb mistake that I did. Thanks![/QUOTE]

Try again with the proof upload. I think it will now work.

[QUOTE=kriesel;556892]No, completely separate. Here's what it looks like, and v29.8b6 on the same system.
(Old slow system, low priority, but there it is. I have older...)[/QUOTE]

A quick scan of VS2019 documentation shows no easy or obvious solution. I don't intend to work on this any more. As you can imagine 15 year old 32-bit OSes are not a high priority, but I do appreciate the test. We at least found and fixed a bug for the remaining one or two Vista users.

I hope this question is ok because I didn't have time to read all of the current 26 pages. Is there a speed increase at all from version 29.8 build 5? Thank you in advance!