[QUOTE=Prime95;551612]Try [URL]https://www.dropbox.com/s/4h7jujxwzmhcsmt/uploader.zip?dl=0[/URL] for Windows

Launch from a DOS shell. Command line arguments are user_id, proof_file_name, chunk_size, bandwidth_limit

Default chunk size is 5 (MB)
Default bandwidth_limit is unlimited. I'm using 1 (Mbps)[/QUOTE]Thanks. Done.
[CODE] Directory of E:\PRP-PROOF-CACHE

07/25/2020 05:16 PM <DIR> .
07/25/2020 05:16 PM <DIR> ..
07/19/2020 09:49 PM 52 00readme-from.txt
07/19/2020 12:06 PM 154,125,076 137000009-8.proof
04/21/2020 12:22 PM 2,785,400 libcrypto-1_1-x64.dll
04/29/2020 06:03 AM 1,102,968 libcurl-x64.dll
04/21/2020 12:22 PM 530,552 libssl-1_1-x64.dll
07/25/2020 05:26 PM 43,520 uploader.exe
07/25/2020 05:11 PM 128 urls.txt
7 File(s) 158,587,696 bytes
2 Dir(s) 1,999,883,456,512 bytes free

E:\PRP-PROOF-CACHE>uploader /?
Proof file name not given

E:\PRP-PROOF-CACHE>uploader kriesel 137000009-8.proof
MD5 of 137000009-8.proof is 5e15c012f63f36a14f7832223b19da40
Proof file exponent is 137000009
Filesize of 137000009-8.proof is 154125076
No entries in need list: {"error_status":401,"error_message":"Unauthorized","error_description":""}

E:\PRP-PROOF-CACHE>rename 137000009-8.proof 137000009.proof

E:\PRP-PROOF-CACHE>uploader kriesel 137000009.proof
MD5 of 137000009.proof is 5e15c012f63f36a14f7832223b19da40
Proof file exponent is 137000009
Filesize of 137000009.proof is 154125076
Success!

E:\PRP-PROOF-CACHE>type 00readme-from.txt
137000009-8.proof condorella rx480 v6.11-340-g...
[/CODE]

The file rename is not needed.

If you get an error, just try again. There is some really, really weird bug going on that I cannot figure out.

[QUOTE=Prime95;551502]BTW, it is now safe to run PRP cofactor tests with proofs.[/QUOTE]

I tried PRP-CF with 35 GB spare disk space in the settings, but it is still using power=8. I guess for PRP-CF that's not really an issue, just reporting.

[QUOTE=kriesel;551564]6/6 Cert successes on Windows (3 different systems; all Windows 10).[/QUOTE]Now 12/12; certs run on 5 systems, 2 of which were Windows 7. One of the 12 was a power-9, the rest power-8. Some of the older slower Xeons I have take 3 hours to do a power 8 cert.

Will there be a way to opt out of doing certs? (Other than downgrading to v29.8b6)
I would not want to have my PRP testing or other work, including manually assigned work, preempted by doing Certs for Ben Delo et al all day and night.

Do I have to set my machine for PRP-DC to get the verification runs?

[QUOTE=kruoli;551642]I tried PRP-CF with 35 GB spare disk space in the settings, but it is still using power=8. I guess for PRP-CF that's not really an issue, just reporting.[/QUOTE]

There is an optimal power where the original tester and the certfier are each doing about the same amount of extra work. Prime95 won't use the extra disk space to choose a non-optimal power.

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;551650]Do I have to set my machine for PRP-DC to get the verification runs?[/QUOTE]

No. The current client rules are: not working on an ECM or P-1 assignment and less than 85% complete on the current assignment. The current server rules are: not ANONYMOUS, must have done at least one LL or PRP, and not a re-certification.

[QUOTE=kriesel;551648]
Will there be a way to opt out of doing certs? (Other than downgrading to v29.8b6).[/QUOTE]

Yes. You could set SequentialWorkTodo=1 right now.

I'm thinking of an opt out flag, or set the download rate limit to zero, or maybe a "no more than N certs per day" setting.

[QUOTE=Prime95;551667]The current server rules are: not ANONYMOUS, must have done at least one LL or PRP, and not a re-certification.[/QUOTE]So, I have to do at least one PRP or PRP-DC on this machine. PRP-CF does not count toward that I guess. My PRP-CF-DC's are doing the VDFs.

[QUOTE=Prime95;551668]Yes. You could set SequentialWorkTodo=1 right now.

I'm thinking of an opt out flag, or set the download rate limit to zero, or maybe a "no more than N certs per day" setting.[/QUOTE]
Thanks. SequentialWorkTodo is a boolean? (0 does work in priority order, 1 does sequentially what's listed under each worker's worktodo section) Note, SequentialWorkTodo=0 appears in undoc.txt, but =1 or its meaning does not explicitly appear there.

Enabling a user specifiable daily quota of n certs per day would straightforwardly provide for optout, if N=0 meant none, not "no restriction".

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;551677]PRP-CF does not count toward that I guess.[/QUOTE]

I'm running first time PRP-CF tests on version 30.1b1 and do not receive any CERT work, either. So (not quite empirically), I'll guess that your assumption may be right.