[QUOTE=Jarod;550080]

[B]Corrected. And apologies for misspelling your name.[/B][/QUOTE]
All good these things happen. I must admit I did think that's an interesting way of spelling my name :)

[QUOTE=Jarod;550390][When I start this job I get the following
CODE]Mon Jul 13 10:30:52 2020 found 38025 cycles, need 2210586
Mon Jul 13 10:30:52 2020 too few cycles, matrix probably cannot build
Mon Jul 13 10:30:52 2020 filtering wants 1000000 more relations[/CODE]
With just over 700,000 pending rels remaining. My question is does this job require more sleeving?[/QUOTE]

What target density did you use?

Mostly likely it needs more relations. I can bump Q up to 45M. That should be sufficient but please let us know if it won’t build.

ETA: Q bumped up to 45M

[QUOTE=swellman;550395]What target density did you use?

Mostly likely it needs more relations. I can bump Q up to 45M. That should be sufficient but please let us know if it won’t build.

ETA: Q bumped up to 45M[/QUOTE]

My apologies I forgot to put I use TD=120 thanks for bumping up to 45 million

f87_127m1 is done:
[code]
p64 factor: 1626790518933699660217425990919548194494386752643800042237225909
p122 factor: 79690914546124921642855696713341754557981571816820049869720576804279343155757948015674135077156641333075494975013408957473
[/code]

Summarised log at [url]https://pastebin.com/tfapdkui[/url]


And f17_202p1 has built a matrix. About 175 hours remain.

Chris

[QUOTE=Jarod;550403]My apologies I forgot to put I use TD=120 thanks for bumping up to 45 million[/QUOTE]

Small jobs don't benefit much from high target densities. Try TD =108 and TD = 120 once you have the new up-to-45M relations, and see for yourself. Even TD = 100 is unlikely to take more than an hour more to solve the matrix than TD =120.

[QUOTE=VBCurtis;550505]Small jobs don't benefit much from high target densities. Try TD =108 and TD = 120 once you have the new up-to-45M relations, and see for yourself. Even TD = 100 is unlikely to take more than an hour more to solve the matrix than TD =120.[/QUOTE]
Thank you for your input. I managed to start job with a TD116 to do that LA phase it's going to take. [CODE]Tue Jul 14 11:43:55 2020 commencing Lanczos iteration (23 threads)
Tue Jul 14 11:43:55 2020 memory use: 2270.0 MB
Tue Jul 14 11:44:00 2020 linear algebra at 0.0%, ETA 2h55m
Tue Jul 14 11:44:02 2020 checkpointing every 1230000 dimensions
[/CODE]This is slightly longer than the "hour" you refer to solve matrix, I like to do the LA phase of the job in the shortest amount of time.
Roughly 35% complete with a 1 hour 55 minutes to go

223__727_5m1 Factors
 

I ended up running number with a TD116 took just over 3 hours and 37 minutes. Find zipped log attached
[CODE]p51 factor: 165575181446411460205828705575691615869005925901441
p106 factor: 7185207381967777817292364114317982628364500160381105212878698339416404696843526675114572666774815941222461[/CODE]
I have added to factor database

Log file at [url]https://pastebin.com/qRdDQj6z[/url]

[QUOTE=Jarod;550513][/CODE]This is slightly longer than the "hour" you refer to solve matrix, I like to do the LA phase of the job in the shortest amount of time.
Roughly 35% complete with a 1 hour 55 minutes to go[/QUOTE]

You misunderstood- I said a lower TD would take less than an hour MORE than TD 120. I made no promises about how long the whole job would take!! (How could I, since I don't know your hardware?)

If you try the same job with TD 104 or 100, I wager the ETA won't change by more than 10%.

[QUOTE=VBCurtis;550540]You misunderstood- I said a lower TD would take less than an hour MORE than TD 120. I made no promises about how long the whole job would take!! (How could I, since I don't know your hardware?)

If you try the same job with TD 104 or 100, I wager the ETA won't change by more than 10%.[/QUOTE]
Very good point. Thank you for explaining I understand now and please accept my apologies

Taking 34273_47m1

161__587_11m1 is complete:
[code]p59 factor: 36778639042250276737180660715318318816446030763271760319767
p137 factor: 23271003117104552433045463135485356432737154412158961286536399265666994289322759380793527863879761875512472866413211692274177854056752279[/code]TD 120 built a 3.73 M matrix which took 5.57 hours to solve (TD 130 didn't work). Log posted at [URL]https://pastebin.com/zY842gvE[/URL] and [URL]https://github.com/Dylan1496/nfs-at-home-logs/blob/master/161__587_11m1.log[/URL].
Taking 7503751_31m1 next.