474__203_5m1 factored
 

[QUOTE=richs;549751]Taking 474__203_5m1[/QUOTE]

[CODE]p67 factor: 1548531997605527342770903037925345748142347538437169879504106104291
p95 factor: 59154726984983279511257220901181393699465210225109649932134436943086100432587102892527614820451[/CODE]

Approximately 12.0 hours (plus another 3 hours for two higher density attempts) on 6 threads of a Core i7-10510U with 12 GB memory for a 3.29M matrix at TD=110 (130 and 120 failed).

Redacted (relation errors removed from first two attempts to get file size with acceptable limits) log attached and at [URL="https://pastebin.com/TgUVisbf"]https://pastebin.com/TgUVisbf[/URL]

Factors added to FDB.

513__059_5m1 was factored:

[code]p70 factor: 1022472044234730151081766839689162675135242025000841550924793529323731
p91 factor: 3308455008576615332621377284791974019723046838866444169742947388473356459913547608933978291[/code]TD 120 built a 3.14 M matrix which took 3h 48m 48 s to solve (TD 130 failed, didn't try intermediate densities). Log posted at [URL]https://pastebin.com/5kidAh7G[/URL] and [URL]https://github.com/Dylan1496/nfs-at-home-logs/blob/master/513__059_5m1.log[/URL].
I'll take 161__587_11m1 next.

Releasing 161__587_11m1
 

I just noticed that the following name Jerod McClintock is beside 161__587_11m1 if this is reserved for "Jarod McClintock" please release it. I was only wanting the 29 bit numbers this is a 30 bit. Thanks.It looks as if Dylan14 has reserved this number looking at the post directly above mine

[B]Corrected. And apologies for misspelling your name.[/B]

Taking f88_127p1.

f86_131m1 factored
 

[code]
p72 factor: 612173923922326581657019590247931006698799923871520013322540302361611037
p99 factor: 336981712877185696749015714085776391300089956153809064891954890065261593501016322435606029085191973
[/code]

[url]https://pastebin.com/6M3Bnmw9[/url]

f84_128p1 is factored:
[code]
p82 factor: 3750014435645851219459254960306953257318650027343054336757561710083126238929618433
p129 factor: 854732059550032122065546006244404112929051650774633051279891601866880023389029494167083608702247774609676705855297153935509459457
[/code]

Log at [url]https://pastebin.com/qaqSX9PV[/url]


And f87_127m1 has built a matrix. About 62 hours remain.


And I'll take f17_202p1 for post processing. It may well take me that long to download the relations.

Chris

Taking 9p8_590M.

Taking 360__473_5m1 and 395__651_7m1.

Taking f21_188p1.

[QUOTE=Jarod;550080][B]Corrected. And apologies for misspelling your name.[/B][/QUOTE]
It happens! You also misspelled your own name :razz:

Does 223__727_5m1 require more sleeving
 

[When I start this job I get the following
[CODE]Mon Jul 13 10:30:52 2020 found 38025 cycles, need 2210586
Mon Jul 13 10:30:52 2020 too few cycles, matrix probably cannot build
Mon Jul 13 10:30:52 2020 filtering wants 1000000 more relations[/CODE]
With just over 700,000 pending rels remaining. My question is does this job require more sleeving?