![]() |
f86_127p1 factored
[CODE]p67 factor: 3498385980439285674938991352134789039065450019967818392938619590627
p139 factor: 3492461917932492004964219154081556988382041275585474159380031598115827814731590030347315833666547000553686858162615527794259307791976249821[/CODE] 206M unique relations built an 11.9M matrix using TD=124. (128 failed) Solve time about 106 hours. (-t 4) Log at: [url]https://pastebin.com/aJPC5MLA[/url] |
217__079_5m1 factored
[QUOTE=richs;545906]Taking 217__079_5m1[/QUOTE]
[CODE]p65 factor: 11222036406882851128305312164865373699949030403707060819718717301 p121 factor: 9548540162903940593149483412678794372201495824040013039025733157102911016875192025939516927042047734336526719589136337421[/CODE] Approximately 10.0 hours on 6 threads of a Core i7-10510U with 12 GB memory for a 3.18M matrix at TD=110 (120 failed). Log attached and at [URL="https://pastebin.com/RbAnz61i"]https://pastebin.com/RbAnz61i[/URL] Factors reported to FDB, |
Taking 193__363_5m1
|
137__121_11m1 factored
[code]
p93 factor: 572953373044495283057250917562066047361835662938762101930382324005700595686660803497762375181 p115 factor: 1872070964323666381686418863674108844166886306317659807756326549077681341361501172852075481954579712271118194194981 [/code] [url]https://pastebin.com/FAWR8bbw[/url] |
(93^124+1)/2309044301090448461075440205529394 (AKA f93_124p1) is factored:
[code] p95 factor: 12625200361928892070512145118337364951424927286912147734244749141000362066249358944456325919649 p117 factor: 423852819305206518041949400554063511690422091249638379682940040522430932277684190163887779012958685754704641807909217 [/code] Reported to factordb and [url]http://myfactors.mooo.com/[/url] Pastebin link [url]https://pastebin.com/8drZZwMz[/url] Chris |
f18_197m1 has built a matrix. About 109 hours 40 minutes remain so I should have a result on Friday.
Built at target density 110. I tried at 120 but msieve ran out of memory because the square root for f93_124p1 was still running. The script then retried at 110 and built a matrix. I'm planning to add some more swap space to make this less likely to happen again. About how much difference in run time will TD 110 instead of 120 make? Chris |
[QUOTE=chris2be8;546361]About how much difference in run time will TD 110 instead of 120 make?
Chris[/QUOTE] It's not even obvious it'll be slower. Let's say -2 to 7% slower? |
Taking f19_193p1.
|
Taking f24_179m1.
|
Taking 729__707_5m1.
|
Taking 110__363_5m1
|
| All times are UTC. The time now is 21:48. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.