Expression evaluation
 

We all know that different processors may give different answers when evaluating -3 mod 2.
But it was news to me that calculators differ in their evaluation of 8÷2(2+2):
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/02/science/math-equation-pedmas-bemdas-bedmas.html[/URL]

They avoid trying to explain to a general audience that \(2^{2^3}=256\)...

8÷2(2+2) is an inconsistent notation, mixing explicit division operator and implicit multiplication operator, so naturally there can be differences in the interpretation.

[QUOTE=axn;522989]8÷2(2+2) is an inconsistent notation, mixing explicit division operator and implicit multiplication operator, so naturally there can be differences in the interpretation.[/QUOTE]BODMAS (in UK schools) BEDMAS (in US ditto) removes any ambiguity.

Takes away the ambiguity by giving precedence to division over multiplication, which are actually meant to have equal precedence which by original (before democratically acronym based convention) convention should be evaluated left-to-right, whichever comes 1st.

I think it is ok for the masses to democratically decide who the experts are, but not to democratically decide what the expert-opinion is and leave that part to the experts in the field. Otherwise we get Wikipedia.:smile:

[QUOTE=xilman;522992]BODMAS (in UK schools) BEDMAS (in US ditto) removes any ambiguity.[/QUOTE]
My hat off to you sir. It took me a good 2 hours to comprehend what you said.:smile:

[QUOTE=a1call;522995]Takes away the ambiguity by giving precedence to division over multiplication, which are actually meant to have equal precedence which by original (before democratically acronym based convention) convention should be evaluated left-to-right, whichever comes 1st.[/QUOTE]

No - the article's description of the convention makes clear that D,M and A,S are treated as equal-precedence operation pairs, with left-to-right breaking the resulting ties. Since C lacks an exponentiation operator this related issue does not arise there, but in my college engineering freshman Fortran class, there it was made clear that with multiple exponentiations in sequence, a**b**c (e.g. a^b^c using symbology more familiar to most of our readers), the order of evaluation is instead right-to-left, i.e. the above is interpreted as a^(b^c), so e.g. 2^3^4 gives 2^(3^4) = 2417851639229258349412352, not (2^3)^4 = 4096.

I tested both the expression in the OP and 2^3^4 using Posix bc, it conforms to the PEMDAS, including the above rule for exponentiation.

In related flamebait news, is it good or bad that C gives << and >> different priority than * and /?

Reading direction
 

Reading direction 8÷ 2(2+2).
[url]https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?p=523038#post523038[/url]

[QUOTE=ewmayer;523039]In related flamebait news, is it good or bad that C gives << and >> different priority than * and /?[/QUOTE]
It is, at least, easy to remember (coming just before < and >).
In my experience, code involving shifts also uses other bitwise operators so you end up needing brackets anyway, e.g.
[CODE]
t=(p<<5|p>>27)+(q&r^~q&s)+t+0x5a827999+tedoen[0];q=q<<30|q>>2;

[/CODE] (cryptonerds will recognize SHA).