Place your bets, gentlemen. Cash on the barrelhead!
I bet $100, again, against 1 italian lira that both of these are composite.

And yeah, you can keep the lira. No need to send it to me.

[QUOTE=tServo;515329]In about 80 minutes or so @ 9 eastern time.[/QUOTE]
YES!!!! countdown to proving my formla in valid once and for all!!!!!

[QUOTE=chalsall;515326]Sorry for speaking into the vacuum, but he doesn't know.

I will probably be sanctioned for daring to speak out of turn, but this is intentional distractionary misdirection.[/QUOTE]


why u do this? why r u picking on me? not nice. you are like the media like to pick on people, bad.

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;515317]If not you have to buy us all a round of drinks.:beer2::uncwilly::beer:[/QUOTE]
i will but i am 15 not anywhere close to buying alcohol age

Here's my prediction as to what will happen:[LIST=1][*]The second "prime" turns out composite.[*]You blame it on hardware error and demand double-checks.[*]Most of us ignore you at this point. But someone will run those double checks anyway.[*]Those double checks confirm the compositeness of both candidates.[*]You then declare that both are actually prime and that this forum is making up fake results to avoid admitting your "genius". (i.e. collusion)[*]You demand people test your 3rd candidate.[*]You finally get ignored by everybody and/or banned from the forum.[/LIST]
This thread has been fun to watch over the past few days. But even for me, it's starting to get old.

[QUOTE=VBCurtis;515324]All you did was restate the claim. That's not a reason. Why is this true? Or, how do you *know* it is true, rather than just saying it is?[/QUOTE]


cause i have checked all combinations up to thousands power and base up to millions, that is sufficient as proof u dont need to check anything over millions
if something is right for up to million than there is no need to check after million it will always be right, common sense logic

[QUOTE=samuel;515336]cause i have checked all combinations up to thousands power and base up to millions, that is sufficient as proof[/QUOTE]

Amongst real mathematicians, this is called "not a proof".

[QUOTE=samuel;515333]why u do this? why r u picking on me? not nice. you are like the media like to pick on people, bad.[/QUOTE]

I have a weird sense of humor. And I had an unusual upbringing.

Imagine, if you can, being given "The Prince" as a nine-year-old...

SURPRISE ! 89023807 is also composite !!
 

The facts:
{"exponent":"89023807", "worktype":"PRP-3", "status":"C", "program":{"name":"gpuowl", "version":"5.0-9c13870"}, "timestamp":"2019-05-01 00:52:55 UTC", "fft-length":5242880, "res64":"c49352b9fc7a9f__", "residue-type":4}

[QUOTE=tServo;515340]The facts:
{"exponent":"89023807", "worktype":"PRP-3", "status":"C", "program":{"name":"gpuowl", "version":"5.0-9c13870"}, "timestamp":"2019-05-01 00:52:55 UTC", "fft-length":5242880, "res64":"c49352b9fc7a9f__", "residue-type":4}[/QUOTE]

Thanks for that! :tu:

There is a truism... Nature abhors a vacuum.

[QUOTE=tServo;515340]The facts:
{"exponent":"89023807", "worktype":"PRP-3", "status":"C", "program":{"name":"gpuowl", "version":"5.0-9c13870"}, "timestamp":"2019-05-01 00:52:55 UTC", "fft-length":5242880, "res64":"c49352b9fc7a9f__", "residue-type":4}[/QUOTE]


ship sunk, my formula is bad thx for checking, i concede


i cry =((((((((