[QUOTE=samuel;515029]i realized the mistake so i corrected it, if you look at timestamp i did that before you post so you can't call me stupid. =)))[/QUOTE]Okay, good job. Glad you found it.

[QUOTE=samuel;515029]i was trying to understand the first problem what the heck is lesbesgian nonmeasurable, the wikipedia article is making terminally no sense, is this math for real?[/QUOTE]It most certainly is for real.

[QUOTE=xilman;515031]It most certainly is for real.[/QUOTE]


well the wikipedia article is making no sense and mentions probability, is this statistics? how is it math if the entire page contains little to no math symbols?

[QUOTE=samuel;515032]well the wikipedia article is making no sense and mentions probability, is this statistics? how is it math if the entire page contains little to no math symbols?[/QUOTE]

Basically, if you take any set that fails the requirement of measurability then it is not Lebesgue measurable. There are many ways to see this, for example, when a set is represented as a disjoint union of countable subsets, when the exterior/outer measure is not countably additive then it is not Lebesgue measurable. Or, take any g-delta sets G, then a set A is not measurable if the exterior measure of them is equal but the set theoretic difference is not zero, same can be applied to f-sigma sets.

Looks these definitions up if you don't understand them, and these concepts are relatively abstract for a high schooler tbh. Don't beat it on yourself if you don't get it (not trying to be offensive here). :smile:

[QUOTE=retina;515030]Okay, good job. Glad you found it.[/QUOTE]


yes you seem very motivated to prove me wrong, all of you

[QUOTE=samuel;515035]yes you seem very motivated to prove me wrong, all of you[/QUOTE]Well then we will look all the more stupid when you find your prime(s).

[QUOTE=retina;515036]Well then we will look all the more stupid when you find your prime(s).[/QUOTE]


thats true =)))
i still dont get that non measurable crap, how is that thing ever useful? why invent something so complicated. or perhaps you are just bad at explaining things to people because what you said make no sense to me. what the heck is subadditive what is g delta and f delta sets why am i doing unions venn diagrams


well anyway when my numbers are prime especially both of them turns out to be i will be invincible just you see

This whole thread is so entertaining for a newbie like me! Can't wait to see what happens next!

[QUOTE=tServo;515010]I apologize if I stepped on anyone's toes who was planning to run these.[/QUOTE]

Thanks, you just wasted a day and half of my computer time. PrimeNet has a reservation system for a reason.

[QUOTE=tServo;515023]Sounds good. I am not poaching so you and George should continue to completion and take the Primenet credits. I will not report my results to PrimeNet, just post them here.
I'll only report thumbs or down and pm the residues.[/QUOTE]

Wrong, you are poaching. Poaching is when you test an exponent assigned to someone else -- whether you post the result or not.

Since I was doing a PRP and I think you are doing an LL test, there is no possibility of a DC.

I have abandoned the work (but kept the assignment so no one else picks it up). Report your result, I have moved on.

[QUOTE=neskis;515041]This whole thread is so entertaining for a newbie like me! Can't wait to see what happens next![/QUOTE]

Yeah.

A friend of mine was in the Canadian military (Navy). The Captain of the ship had his First Officer keep a log book which recorded whatever sentence was the most amusing or poignant from the crew that day.

I would argue that [URL="https://mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=513966&postcount=177"]GP2[/URL]'s post would certainly qualify if such a log was kept here: "Theater comes in many different genres.