[QUOTE=ChZ;579895]Requesting LL triple-check:

DoubleCheck= [URL="https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=57546917&full=1"]57546917[/URL],75,1[/QUOTE]
You and I are both correct.

Took following; ETAs a few days barring system issues
Cat 1
DoubleCheck=[M]57572677[/M],74,1
DoubleCheck=[M]57614243[/M],74,1
DoubleCheck=[M]57835289[/M],75,1
DoubleCheck=[M]57873833[/M],75,1
DoubleCheck=[M]57890477[/M],74,1

List has been updated with a few new exponents.

A new quad check of a 332M exponent is needed (or a PRP on it). 1 LL is suspect, the other 2 are not.

List is up to date.

FWIW (not much), the 0-shift LL run on M[M]332250197[/M] had no Jacobi check errors indicated in the gpuowl.log. I'd like to see a matching LL on this one to help define 100Mdigit LL error rate better. But it is a substantial effort at ~4950. GHD.

Took:
Cat 1
DoubleCheck=[M]57106099[/M],74,1
DoubleCheck=[M]57974659[/M],74,1
ETA within a week barring system or power issues.

[QUOTE=kriesel;580709]FWIW (not much), the 0-shift LL run on M[M]332250197[/M] had no Jacobi check errors indicated in the gpuowl.log. I'd like to see a matching LL on this one to help define 100Mdigit LL error rate better. But it is a substantial effort at ~4950. GHD.[/QUOTE]If someone wanted to figure a fair exchange rate on this, I might be willing to do it in exchange for a GPU doing TF on exponents in the 332M range to bring them to the recommended bit level. I could take one of my borged boxen ( Intel Core i7-9700 @ 3.00GHz) and dedicate it to the task for a while.
[When I looked up the details on this machine on PrimeNet to post it I found out it (and another borg) had 8 cores vs the 6 I thought. I changed the settings and am now employing all 8 of those.]

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;580713]If someone wanted to figure a fair exchange rate on this,...[/QUOTE]30 TF from 78 to 81 bits at 100Mdigit? Or 30 P-1 to adequate bounds?

[QUOTE=kriesel;580720]30 TF from 78 to 81 bits at 100Mdigit? Or 30 P-1 to adequate bounds?[/QUOTE]I have started the exponent and gotten it assigned. Prime95 says 3 months to go. I don't know if that is the right exchange rate, but I will do it. I think that if they are currently at 78 bits that is closer to fair than just bumping some from 80 to 81.
[url]https://www.mersenne.org/report_factoring_effort/?exp_lo=332192831&exp_hi=332250000&bits_lo=78&bits_hi=&txt=1&exassigned=1&tfonly=1&worktodo=1&tftobits=81[/url]

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;580725]I have started the exponent and gotten it assigned. Prime95 says 3 months to go. I don't know if that is the right exchange rate, but I will do it. I think that if they are currently at 78 bits that is closer to fair than just bumping some from 80 to 81.
[URL]https://www.mersenne.org/report_factoring_effort/?exp_lo=332192831&exp_hi=332250000&bits_lo=78&bits_hi=&txt=1&exassigned=1&tfonly=1&worktodo=1&tftobits=81[/URL][/QUOTE]
I estimated 1 in 30 would get factored and eliminate need for a PRP. 40:1 P-1 might be equal effort.

I've reserved these 31 in P-1 and will also TF the survivors as below.

[CODE]Factor=[M]332309569[/M],78,81
Factor=[M]332327231[/M],78,81
Factor=[M]332327243[/M],78,81
Factor=[M]332327371[/M],78,81
Factor=[M]332327581[/M],78,81
Factor=[M]332327629[/M],78,81
Factor=[M]332327659[/M],78,81
Factor=[M]332327683[/M],78,81
Factor=[M]332327729[/M],78,81
Factor=[M]332327833[/M],78,81
Factor=[M]332327899[/M],78,81
Factor=[M]332328103[/M],78,81
Factor=[M]332328287[/M],78,81
Factor=[M]332328439[/M],78,81
Factor=[M]332328527[/M],78,81
Factor=[M]332328539[/M],78,81
Factor=[M]332328547[/M],78,81
Factor=[M]332328551[/M],78,81
Factor=[M]332329031[/M],78,81
Factor=[M]332329391[/M],78,81
Factor=[M]332329493[/M],78,81
Factor=[M]332330993[/M],78,81
Factor=[M]332331001[/M],78,81
Factor=[M]332331059[/M],78,81
Factor=[M]332331061[/M],78,81
Factor=[M]332331127[/M],78,81
Factor=[M]332331161[/M],78,81
Factor=[M]332331217[/M],78,81
Factor=[M]332331331[/M],78,81
Factor=[M]332331353[/M],78,81
Factor=[M]332331361[/M],78,81[/CODE]

[QUOTE=kriesel;580729]I estimated 1 in 30 would get factored and eliminate need for a PRP. 40:1 P-1 might be equal effort.[/QUOTE]Cool. I expect on Tuesday the estimate of when the LL gets done will be better. This is a relatively new borg so the rolling average is not perfect. I moved the Cat 1 DC's it was doing to another machine.

Took:
Cat 1
DoubleCheck=57826103,74,1
DoubleCheck=57836777,74,1

The estimated run time is ~11 days in Gpuowl on a RadeonVII for the 100Mdigit P-1 batch of 31, and one factor has already been found, not yet reported; TF on a GTX1080Ti is projected as about a month so will be split with another GPU.