Took:


Cat 1
DoubleCheck=[M]56548081[/M],74,1
DoubleCheck=[M]56672563[/M],75,1
DoubleCheck=[M]57063857[/M],75,1
DoubleCheck=[M]57082673[/M],75,1
DoubleCheck=[M]57157357[/M],75,1
DoubleCheck=[M]57183923[/M],74,1
DoubleCheck=[M]57205703[/M],74,1

FYI, I'm at 92% and 4 days ETA on TC of [M]192000103[/M]; first was prime95, second was gpuowl, third is CUDALucas, on different systems / hardware types too. Can't reserve it myself, because same user as first two tests. This is an attempt at cleanup on my effort to get an LL DCed and PRP DCed (or cert) in every 1M bin up to 200M.

[QUOTE=kriesel;578427]Took:[/QUOTE]
Cool.

BTW, James and Aaron have provided me a custom query to help with the strategic TC's. It is much faster to run than what I had been doing and provides the actual bit level of work done. I still have a few tweaks to do on my end. But, I have done all of the change over that I needed to do.

[QUOTE=kriesel;578427]
FYI, I'm at 92% and 4 days ETA on TC of [M]192000103[/M]; first was prime95, second was gpuowl, third is CUDALucas, on different systems / hardware types too. Can't reserve it myself, because same user as first two tests. This is an attempt at cleanup on my effort to get an LL DCed and PRP DCed (or cert) in every 1M bin up to 200M.[/QUOTE]After some digging through logs that took longer than the edit time limit:

The CUDALucas interim residues agree with Gpuowl's to 120M and not at 121M and later. Unfortunately there are no interim residues available from the prime95 run. At least the gpuowl run is bad; the gpuowl run was switched from a slow RX550 to [URL="https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=574709&postcount=19"]this gpu[/URL] from ~118-119M onward, before I knew the Radeon VII was a reliability problem with Samsung vram and normal clocking.
And it showed subsequent errors (only one shown here):
[CODE]2021-02-05 11:13:58 roa/radeonvii 192000103 LL 121100000 63.07%; 1819 us/it; ETA 1d 11:50; 3db2811a3769b223
2021-02-05 11:17:00 roa/radeonvii 192000103 LL 121200000 63.12%; 1820 us/it; ETA 1d 11:47; dfa4710b09887314
2021-02-05 11:17:00 roa/radeonvii 192000103 OK 121000000 (jacobi == -1)
2021-02-05 11:20:02 roa/radeonvii 192000103 LL 121300000 63.18%; 1820 us/it; ETA 1d 11:45; e080991b83f850f4
2021-02-05 11:23:04 roa/radeonvii 192000103 LL 121400000 63.23%; 1820 us/it; ETA 1d 11:41; 454b04a6033d8a77
2021-02-05 11:26:05 roa/radeonvii 192000103 LL 121500000 63.28%; 1812 us/it; ETA 1d 11:29; 0000000000000002
2021-02-05 11:29:06 roa/radeonvii 192000103 LL 121600000 63.33%; 1808 us/it; ETA 1d 11:21; 0000000000000002
2021-02-05 11:29:06 roa/radeonvii 192000103 EE 121500000 (jacobi == 0)
2021-02-05 11:29:07 roa/radeonvii 192000103 LL 121000000 loaded: b39483545c5a11f7
[/CODE]If the CUDALucas final result does not match the prime95 run, interim residues will be available for a quad check. Possibly by resurrecting an earlier state of the gpuowl run from deep backups.

[URL="https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=56561041&full=1"]56561041[/URL] needs a TC

[QUOTE=moebius;578621][URL="https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=56561041&full=1"]56561041[/URL] needs a TC[/QUOTE]Ken took that.

List updated too

Also took:
Cat 1
DoubleCheck=[M]56987351[/M],74,1
DoubleCheck=[M]57055721[/M],74,1
DoubleCheck=[M]57190453[/M],74,1
DoubleCheck=[M]57190927[/M],74,1
DoubleCheck=[M]57224663[/M],74,1

My old reliable GTX1060 came through on the CUDALucas TC of M[M]192000103[/M], matching the prime95 first test residue, in ~50.5 days nonstop.
[CODE]Starting M192000103 fft length = 10752K
| Date Time | Test Num Iter Residue | FFT Error ms/It Time | ETA Done |
| Mar 28 22:45:36 | M192000103 500 0x11f10b6aa1920e65 | 10752K 0.17188 22.7582 11.37s | 50:13:46:16 0.00% |
...
| May 18 10:32:10 | M192000103 192000000 0x093dc213992bf688 | 10752K 0.19531 22.7160 227.16s | 0:02 99.99% |
M( 192000103 )C, 0x0c4ee3405f680447, 10752K, CUDALucas v2.06beta, estimated total time = 1211:42:15
[/CODE]So that one can be deleted from the TC list.

Requesting LL triple-check:

DoubleCheck= [URL="https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=58724849&full=1"]58724849[/URL],76,1

Took following, ETAs by ~May 30, barring system issues;

Cat 1
DoubleCheck=[M]56446021[/M],74,1
DoubleCheck=[M]56848373[/M],76,1
DoubleCheck=[M]57139183[/M],74,1
DoubleCheck=[M]57308143[/M],74,1
DoubleCheck=[M]57357359[/M],74,1
DoubleCheck=[M]57458873[/M],74,1
DoubleCheck=[M]57538279[/M],74,1

List has been updated. Someone has been taking the exponents up a bit or 2.

Took the following:

2 unverified results
Cat 1
DoubleCheck=[M]57244697[/M],74,1
DoubleCheck=[M]57297659[/M],74,1

As PRPDC:
Exponents with 1 LL + 1 PRP result:
PRP=1,2,[M]84944921[/M],-1
PRP=1,2,[M]84969113[/M],-1
PRP=1,2,[M]85141577[/M],-1
PRP=1,2,[M]85427897[/M],-1
PRP=1,2,[M]86042767[/M],-1
PRP=1,2,[M]86961583[/M],-1
PRP=1,2,[M]87009059[/M],-1
PRP=1,2,[M]87051017[/M],-1
PRP=1,2,[M]87215537[/M],-1
PRP=1,2,[M]88102523[/M],-1
PRP=1,2,[M]88391669[/M],-1
PRP=1,2,[M]89023807[/M],-1
PRP=1,2,[M]89876881[/M],-1