[QUOTE=Marcelo Collett;556148]Alright. Thanks.[/QUOTE]

and.... Welcome to the forum!

[QUOTE=ChZ;551550]Requesting triple-check:

DoubleCheck=[URL="https://www.mersenne.org/M57359399"]57359399[/URL],75,1[/QUOTE]
Anon's assignment expired. San someone else claim this?

One way to manually check for likely TC candidates, without too much work, is... Reports -> Detailed Reports -> LL Results. Then input a range, currently I use 52000000 to 64000000. Check "Exclude verified results". Set a semi-recent start date, for example 01/01/2020. And voila, there's a nice list. Of course it also lists exponents that have already been assigned to someone, but that's still quite a small amount of work, going through the list and picking a few that haven't been assigned yet. As of writing this, there are 267 unverified exponents on that list, and only a small portion of them are assigned. Now, if there were a way to make that same search and show only unassigned exponents...

[URL="https://www.mersenne.org/report_ll/?exp_lo=52000000&exp_hi=64000000&exp_date=2020-01-01&end_date=&user_only=0&user_id=&exdchk=1&dispdate=1&exbad=1&exfactor=1&B1="]Here's the same search as a direct link.[/URL]

[QUOTE=moebius;556143]Not yet, but 53M with 2.75M FFT[/QUOTE]

Yes 53M was fine for me as well. When you reach 54M you will probably have the same problem.

The "-use STATS" command which I did not know previously shows this:
Roundoff: N=100000, mean 0.290692, SD 0.018230, CV 0.062711, max 0.437387, z 11.5 (pErr 99.999508%)

So 99.999508% chance of a bad result.

[url]https://mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=556149&postcount=2424[/url]

[QUOTE=ChZ;556102]DoubleCheck=[URL="https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=55035623&full=1"]55035623[/URL],75,1[/QUOTE]
You have been matched.

[QUOTE=ChZ;556111]Requesting triple-check:

DoubleCheck=[URL="https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=55709483&full=1"]55709483[/URL],76,1[/QUOTE]
Picked up by rando user.

Latest progress: 58.5 % 2020-09-19

A get'em and do'em quick list of exponents below 55.5M (all Cat 0 - 2)
[CODE][B][U]Cat 0[/U][/B]

[U][B]Cat 1[/B][/U]


[U][B]Cat 2[/B][/U]
Doublecheck=[M]55202269[/M],74,1
Doublecheck=[M]55279877[/M],74,1
Doublecheck=[M]55282933[/M],74,1
Doublecheck=[M]55304441[/M],74,1
Doublecheck=[M]55335229[/M],74,1
Doublecheck=[M]55341709[/M],74,1
Doublecheck=[M]55342481[/M],74,1
Doublecheck=[M]55351657[/M],74,1
Doublecheck=[M]55357381[/M],74,1
Doublecheck=[M]55414069[/M],74,1
Doublecheck=[M]55414609[/M],74,1
Doublecheck=[M]55438157[/M],74,1
Doublecheck=[M]55483247[/M],74,1
Doublecheck=[M]55485043[/M],74,1
Doublecheck=[M]55486303[/M],74,1
Doublecheck=[M]55491223[/M],74,1
Doublecheck=[M]55499039[/M],74,1
Doublecheck=[M]55520789[/M],74,1
Doublecheck=[M]55547207[/M],74,1
Doublecheck=[M]55561897[/M],74,1
Doublecheck=[M]55564499[/M],74,1
Doublecheck=[M]55568041[/M],74,1
Doublecheck=[M]55569047[/M],74,1
Doublecheck=[M]55607317[/M],74,1
Doublecheck=[M]55611251[/M],74,1
Doublecheck=[M]55655893[/M],74,1
Doublecheck=[M]55673131[/M],74,1
Doublecheck=[M]55687759[/M],74,1
Doublecheck=[M]55761749[/M],74,1
Doublecheck=[M]55837099[/M],74,1
Doublecheck=[M]55837109[/M],74,1
[/CODE]

This list has been moved up to the regular list.

[QUOTE=nomead;556156]Now, if there were a way to make that same search and show only unassigned exponents.[/QUOTE]
Thanks for that link.
I figured out how to do it with 2 searches (data imports) inside excel (up to the first 1000 assignments.) I might be able to extend that for the first 5000 with a little extra work in excel.

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;556660]A get'em and do'em quick list of exponents below 55M[/QUOTE]

Took all but one up to M54119441. One was already taken.

[QUOTE=Mark Rose;556665]Took all but one up to M54119441. One was already taken.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=moebius;555946]I took this TC too
[URL="https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=54083459&full=1"]54083459[/URL][/QUOTE]
I want to inform you that I am currently calculating this exponent, it is at 53% with 1.55 ms / it, so please don't waste your computing time.

[QUOTE=moebius;556667]I want to inform you that I am currently calculating this exponent, it is at 53% with 1.55 ms / it, so please don't waste your computing time.[/QUOTE]

I'll skip it. In the future, please register the exponent so you're not poaching someone!