[QUOTE=ATH;555398]TC: (Cannot use gpuowl with 0 shift, since I already used it)
[M]54091019[/M]
[M]54091039[/M]
[M]54091097[/M][/QUOTE]

These are Cat 1 assignments, but I take these over with Prime95 and Ryzen7-3700X if nobody has anything against it.

[QUOTE=moebius;555400]These are Cat 1 assignments, but I take these over with Prime95 and Ryzen7-3700X if nobody has anything against it.[/QUOTE]
Just do them quickly.

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;555409]Just do them quickly.[/QUOTE]

The first DC starts in approximately 5 hours with 1,65 ms/it.

You didn't match at 54091019.
other two TC'S are in progess

[QUOTE=moebius;555500]You didn't match at 54091019.
other two TC'S are in progess[/QUOTE]

Thanks. That is very weird since they were run on a Tesla P100 on Google Colab Pro, and those Tesla cards have ECC RAM.
But I did suspect something went wrong with that instance since 3 did not match in a row. Actually a 4th did not match after I posted the first 3:
[M]54091099[/M]

Since then I did have matching results. The instances restart every ~24h so I assume it was one faulty card and I got a new one now.

[QUOTE=ATH;555505]
[M]54091099[/M].[/QUOTE]

I do this TC as well, I had a faulty Tesla T-80 at colab a few month before.

[QUOTE=ATH;555505]That is very weird[/QUOTE]

I do this triple checks.
[M]54094517[/M]
[M]54094567[/M]
[M]54095017[/M]
[M]54095039[/M]
[M]54095089[/M]
[M]54095177[/M]

Thanks. I kept getting those mismatches even on the new V100 cards. I'm pretty sure now it is because gpuowl chooses a too low FFT size for those 54M exponents: 2.75M FFT.

I'm now forcing it to use 3M FFT and have had no mismatch so far.

[url]https://mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=22204[/url]

I took this TC too
[URL="https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=54083459&full=1"]54083459[/URL]

I took DoubleCheck=[M]84390379[/M],76,1 it should be done in about 2 weeks.

[QUOTE=moebius;555867]I do this triple checks.
54094517[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=moebius;555946]I took this TC too
[URL="https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=54083459&full=1"]54083459[/URL][/QUOTE]
Those are on the lists in this thread. If you have a source for exponents that need TC's can you point to it?