[QUOTE=Madpoo;516692]Where are you seeing a link? I thought I had commented out all of the defunct links to mersennewiki. I haven't seen the replacement yet - I knew it was being worked on but hadn't heard anything else.[/QUOTE]

It's still in the Prime95 help menu. I think the GIMPS website is fine.

[QUOTE=ixfd64;516694]It's still in the Prime95 help menu. I think the GIMPS website is fine.[/QUOTE]

Fixed in next build. Thanks.

[QUOTE=PhilF;516667]I am going to attempt to set the record for the most trivial bug ever reported.

Now, when mprime submits ECM results, if only 1 curve was run the result report on the web site shows "1 curves". It used to say "1 curve".

Do I get a prize or something?[/QUOTE]

I wasn't quite sure what page you saw that on. Here's an example of an exponent with a single ECM curve turned in from someone and it renders as expected (singular "curve"):
[URL="https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=222316561&exp_hi=&full=1&ecmhist=1"]M222316561[/URL]

If you wouldn't mind including the URL where you saw that, I can take a look. Or maybe it was somewhere in your specific account details or something?

Here's one:

[url]https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=10611691&exp_hi=&full=1&ecmhist=1[/url]

[QUOTE=Prime95;516655]I don't think so. Do you still have the example?[/QUOTE]

I still have the save files, but unfortunately my computer has been having a problem where it would frequently freeze and restart on its own. I can barely use it for a few minutes before it crashes. I'll try to retrieve the save files after I get it fixed.

[QUOTE=ixfd64;516638]I noticed a minor inconsistency: Prime95 always appends two newlines to [C]results.bench.txt[/C] when it adds en entry. In the other results files, Prime95 only adds one newline at a time. I assume this is unintentional.[/QUOTE]

Possibly related issue: Prime95 sometimes appends a timestamp to [C]results.bench.txt[/C] even when there are no further benchmarks:

[QUOTE][Tue May 14 09:43:12 2019]
FFTlen=5120K, Type=3, Arch=4, Pass1=256, Pass2=20480, clm=4 (2 cores, 2 workers): 139.85, 145.95 ms. Throughput: 14.00 iter/sec.
FFTlen=5120K, Type=3, Arch=4, Pass1=256, Pass2=20480, clm=2 (2 cores, 2 workers): 77.50, 84.59 ms. Throughput: 24.73 iter/sec.
FFTlen=5120K, Type=3, Arch=4, Pass1=256, Pass2=20480, clm=1 (2 cores, 2 workers): 69.04, 79.34 ms. Throughput: 27.09 iter/sec.
FFTlen=5120K, Type=3, Arch=4, Pass1=320, Pass2=16384, clm=4 (2 cores, 2 workers): 67.16, 71.81 ms. Throughput: 28.82 iter/sec.
FFTlen=5120K, Type=3, Arch=4, Pass1=320, Pass2=16384, clm=2 (2 cores, 2 workers): 70.60, 72.47 ms. Throughput: 27.96 iter/sec.
FFTlen=5120K, Type=3, Arch=4, Pass1=320, Pass2=16384, clm=1 (2 cores, 2 workers): 76.72, 79.73 ms. Throughput: 25.58 iter/sec.
FFTlen=5120K, Type=3, Arch=4, Pass1=512, Pass2=10240, clm=4 (2 cores, 2 workers): 71.50, 78.28 ms. Throughput: 26.76 iter/sec.
FFTlen=5120K, Type=3, Arch=4, Pass1=512, Pass2=10240, clm=2 (2 cores, 2 workers): 67.50, 70.45 ms. Throughput: 29.01 iter/sec.
FFTlen=5120K, Type=3, Arch=4, Pass1=512, Pass2=10240, clm=1 (2 cores, 2 workers): 63.39, 66.65 ms. Throughput: 30.78 iter/sec.
FFTlen=5120K, Type=3, Arch=4, Pass1=640, Pass2=8192, clm=4 (2 cores, 2 workers): 74.18, 75.13 ms. Throughput: 26.79 iter/sec.
FFTlen=5120K, Type=3, Arch=4, Pass1=640, Pass2=8192, clm=2 (2 cores, 2 workers): 59.12, 66.70 ms. Throughput: 31.91 iter/sec.
FFTlen=5120K, Type=3, Arch=4, Pass1=640, Pass2=8192, clm=1 (2 cores, 2 workers): 67.94, 71.46 ms. Throughput: 28.71 iter/sec.
FFTlen=5120K, Type=3, Arch=4, Pass1=1024, Pass2=5120, clm=4 (2 cores, 2 workers): 76.80, 79.12 ms. Throughput: 25.66 iter/sec.
FFTlen=5120K, Type=3, Arch=4, Pass1=1024, Pass2=5120, clm=2 (2 cores, 2 workers): 80.23, 75.21 ms. Throughput: 25.76 iter/sec.
FFTlen=5120K, Type=3, Arch=4, Pass1=1024, Pass2=5120, clm=1 (2 cores, 2 workers): 70.73, 69.32 ms. Throughput: 28.56 iter/sec.
FFTlen=5120K, Type=3, Arch=4, Pass1=1280, Pass2=4096, clm=4 (2 cores, 2 workers): 74.33, 80.91 ms. Throughput: 25.81 iter/sec.
FFTlen=5120K, Type=3, Arch=4, Pass1=1280, Pass2=4096, clm=2 (2 cores, 2 workers): 62.55, 70.21 ms. Throughput: 30.23 iter/sec.
FFTlen=5120K, Type=3, Arch=4, Pass1=1280, Pass2=4096, clm=1 (2 cores, 2 workers): 63.12, 71.52 ms. Throughput: 29.83 iter/sec.
[Tue May 14 09:48:14 2019]

<EOF>[/QUOTE]

Prime95 main thread:

[QUOTE][Main thread May 14 09:42] Benchmarking multiple workers to tune FFT selection.
[Main thread May 14 09:42] Timing 5120K FFT, 2 cores, 2 workers. Average times: 139.85, 145.95 ms. Total throughput: 14.00 iter/sec.
[Main thread May 14 09:43] Timing 5120K FFT, 2 cores, 2 workers. Average times: 77.50, 84.59 ms. Total throughput: 24.73 iter/sec.
[Main thread May 14 09:43] Timing 5120K FFT, 2 cores, 2 workers. Average times: 69.04, 79.34 ms. Total throughput: 27.09 iter/sec.
[Main thread May 14 09:43] Timing 5120K FFT, 2 cores, 2 workers. Average times: 67.16, 71.81 ms. Total throughput: 28.82 iter/sec.
[Main thread May 14 09:44] Timing 5120K FFT, 2 cores, 2 workers. Average times: 70.60, 72.47 ms. Total throughput: 27.96 iter/sec.
[Main thread May 14 09:44] Timing 5120K FFT, 2 cores, 2 workers. Average times: 76.72, 79.73 ms. Total throughput: 25.58 iter/sec.
[Main thread May 14 09:44] Timing 5120K FFT, 2 cores, 2 workers. Average times: 71.50, 78.28 ms. Total throughput: 26.76 iter/sec.
[Main thread May 14 09:45] Timing 5120K FFT, 2 cores, 2 workers. Average times: 67.50, 70.45 ms. Total throughput: 29.01 iter/sec.
[Main thread May 14 09:45] Timing 5120K FFT, 2 cores, 2 workers. Average times: 63.39, 66.65 ms. Total throughput: 30.78 iter/sec.
[Main thread May 14 09:45] Timing 5120K FFT, 2 cores, 2 workers. Average times: 74.18, 75.13 ms. Total throughput: 26.79 iter/sec.
[Main thread May 14 09:45] Timing 5120K FFT, 2 cores, 2 workers. Average times: 59.12, 66.70 ms. Total throughput: 31.91 iter/sec.
[Main thread May 14 09:46] Timing 5120K FFT, 2 cores, 2 workers. Average times: 67.94, 71.46 ms. Total throughput: 28.71 iter/sec.
[Main thread May 14 09:46] Timing 5120K FFT, 2 cores, 2 workers. Average times: 76.80, 79.12 ms. Total throughput: 25.66 iter/sec.
[Main thread May 14 09:46] Timing 5120K FFT, 2 cores, 2 workers. Average times: 80.23, 75.21 ms. Total throughput: 25.76 iter/sec.
[Main thread May 14 09:47] Timing 5120K FFT, 2 cores, 2 workers. Average times: 70.73, 69.32 ms. Total throughput: 28.56 iter/sec.
[Main thread May 14 09:47] Timing 5120K FFT, 2 cores, 2 workers. Average times: 74.33, 80.91 ms. Total throughput: 25.81 iter/sec.
[Main thread May 14 09:47] Timing 5120K FFT, 2 cores, 2 workers. Average times: 62.55, 70.21 ms. Total throughput: 30.23 iter/sec.
[Main thread May 14 09:47] Timing 5120K FFT, 2 cores, 2 workers. Average times: 63.12, 71.52 ms. Total throughput: 29.83 iter/sec.
[Main thread May 14 09:48]
[Main thread May 14 09:48] Throughput benchmark complete.[/QUOTE]

When I run the new Mac OS X version 29.8b3 windows come up with black text on black backgrounds. If I select the text the background changes to blue and the text becomes visible. Im running the latest macOS Mojave version 10.14.4

[QUOTE=PhilF;516775]Here's one:

[url]https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=10611691&exp_hi=&full=1&ecmhist=1[/url][/QUOTE]

Thanks. Fun little artifact of how the JSON result is being parsed. I can work on a fix for that later. With the non-JSON results I was just taking the text from the result as-is which had the correct work, but for JSON I must have been lazy and just used "curves" irrespective of how many. :smile:

[QUOTE=Madpoo;516857]Thanks. Fun little artifact of how the JSON result is being parsed. I can work on a fix for that later. With the non-JSON results I was just taking the text from the result as-is which had the correct work, but for JSON I must have been lazy and just used "curves" irrespective of how many. :smile:[/QUOTE]

Later? You mean this isn't a showstopper? :smile:

[QUOTE=PhilF;516859]Later? You mean this isn't a showstopper? :smile:[/QUOTE]

LOL... no. :smile:

But I did get it done. Had to juggle some code so I pull the # of curves out of the JSON first and then choose which word based on that, but simple enough. Testing it took longer.

[URL="https://www.mersenne.org/M10611691"]M10611691[/URL]

[QUOTE=brucix;516842]When I run the new Mac OS X version 29.8b3 windows come up with black text on black backgrounds. If I select the text the background changes to blue and the text becomes visible. Im running the latest macOS Mojave version 10.14.4[/QUOTE]

Thanks a lot :yucky:

I upgraded to Mojave. This broke xcode. The App Store won't download a new xcode.

I hate Apple....