Taking 8m7_295

Taking 11p7_242.

C164_11040_10143 completed - 55 hours for 6.8M matrix (TD=140)

[CODE]prp82 factor: 2936812372920035829818278826014296529383133787618758424111543066241933076793116039
prp83 factor: 18384190132947231288886919914711069031320301397436959689084582769817001440833899159[/CODE][URL]https://pastebin.com/wmge2jjw[/URL]

[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;529767]Will try 11p6_260.[/QUOTE]


ECM miss?


[CODE]Wed Nov 06 16:32:50 2019 p51 factor: 276017567594207723980399962521220184735159530554521
Wed Nov 06 16:32:50 2019 p109 factor: 7022805158582590928765172567021719835721679575278277748372316742307482869072083742484036831739686909785422041[/CODE]


[url]https://pastebin.com/9WCPQZyE[/url]

[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;529818]ECM miss?
[/QUOTE]

Quite possibly. There's a 1.6% chance that a t55 would fail to find this P51. OTOH, it's also possible that this composite got accidentally skipped over during ECM runs. We don't have good information on which specific composites Bob did his t55 runs on, though this one has been in the first 5 holes of its table for a long time.

[QUOTE=jyb;529830]Quite possibly. There's a 1.6% chance that a t55 would fail to find this P51. OTOH, it's also possible that this composite got accidentally skipped over during ECM runs. We don't have good information on which specific composites Bob did his t55 runs on, though this one has been in the first 5 holes of its table for a long time.[/QUOTE]

I did 11,6+ fairly recently. I just checked the input file. For some reason I missed
including this number among the inputs. --> Can you say "brain damage"?

[QUOTE=R.D. Silverman;529831]I did 11,6+ fairly recently. I just checked the input file. For some reason I missed
including this number among the inputs. --> Can you say "brain damage"?[/QUOTE]

Oversights happen, no big deal. However, I do see that you sent me a factor report for 11+6,291 in September. Since that one was nowhere near the first 5 holes, I'm wondering if there was just a more general mix-up with that table. Is that something you can check?

[QUOTE=jyb;529833]Oversights happen, no big deal. However, I do see that you sent me a factor report for 11+6,291 in September. Since that one was nowhere near the first 5 holes, I'm wondering if there was just a more general mix-up with that table. Is that something you can check?[/QUOTE]

Please shared credit NFS and Bob on this one under your stats.

[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;529837]Please shared credit NFS and Bob on this one under your stats.[/QUOTE]

Uh, but as he says above, Bob didn't do any ECM for it. With what would I be crediting him?

[QUOTE=jyb;529839]Uh, but as he says above, Bob didn't do any ECM for it. With what would I be crediting him?[/QUOTE]

By his brain damage...just credit him please for his miss doing the post-processing and NFS the sieving.

[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;529872]By his brain damage...just credit him please for his miss doing the post-processing and NFS the sieving.[/QUOTE]

I think you're misunderstanding what he said above. The "brain damage" he referred to is that he accidentally left this number out of the set of composites on which he was running ECM back in September. He never tried to do post-processing of this number.