[QUOTE=fivemack;518188]I am very confused - my post [url]https://mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=518111&postcount=379[/url] says I'm taking 12p11_253, but your quote of it [url]https://mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=518146&postcount=380[/url] says 12m5_253. I am half inclined to take 12m5_253 too, and half inclined to see your post as a reservation of 12m5_253 in rather peculiar form. Please advise.[/QUOTE]

My post was not intended as a reservation, nor was I attempting to say anything at all about 12p11_253. My reference to your post was simply about the part of it that mentioned finishing sieving, as I was attempting to discuss finishing sieving on a different number (12m5_253).

Although now that I look at it, 12p11_253 appears to have the same issue as the one I mentioned for 12m5_253: over 250 work units have gone missing. You say you'll take it when the sieving is finished, but all indications are that the sieving will never finish. The server doesn't think there are any pending work units, and AFAICT, none has been returned in a while.

Linear algebra on 12p11_253 should be finished here by Sunday morning - I ran a wget -c, noticed there hadn't been any more relations, and started filtering.

Would you like me to take 12m5_253? I expect there to be enough relations now, and the hardware I have access to is chunky enough that I don't care whether the matrix is 13M or 20M.

Taking 273__487_5m1

9p7_286 factored
 

[code]
p56 factor: 30554283496705486086225797402330664467430862756211935177
p144 factor: 105112818785530886466194494685246327784006490304778065007318848367829328130583558662924512640218069071192587301356889905073154742096804931103081
[/code]

[url]https://pastebin.com/b6NypLRy[/url]

[QUOTE=fivemack;518227]Linear algebra on 12p11_253 should be finished here by Sunday morning - I ran a wget -c, noticed there hadn't been any more relations, and started filtering.

Would you like me to take 12m5_253? I expect there to be enough relations now, and the hardware I have access to is chunky enough that I don't care whether the matrix is 13M or 20M.[/QUOTE]

If you think there are enough relations to build a decent matrix, then by all means go ahead.

But my question about how the server accounting works still stands: what happened to all of those work units for both of these numbers? I suspect it's one that Greg will have to answer.

9p5_286 done
 

[code]
Sat Jun 1 05:49:07 2019 p81 factor: 209819217492829758364279098364580022832099723691231993559253895023080842907124237
Sat Jun 1 05:49:07 2019 p108 factor: 219890907410734446681042089031435298796046586166317005955190801216585603160482087411859404615893374151923293
[/code]

68.3 hours for 13.63M matrix at density 116 (not 118) on 6 cores i7/4930K VBITS=128

Log attached and at [url]https://pastebin.com/iRJ2zskr[/url]

Taking 114__449_5m1.

11p10_253 factored
 

[CODE]p74 factor: 52105341302210937562203401216786845593841352383291858382917122897845103439
p127 factor: 4786858699998216253844967994735560739300549644414722513033356704065736305346636252455408937426237146548894641004935534571367077[/CODE]
212M unique relations built an 8.0M matrix using TD=132.
Solve time about 39 hours. (-t 4)

Log at: [url]https://pastebin.com/0eQnYq7H[/url]

890__871_5m1 factored
 

[QUOTE=richs;518069]Taking 890__871_5m1[/QUOTE]

[CODE]p68 factor: 27239322987046491744025128781398177436138745795382542028753254944991

p115 factor: 1924817662578207242562352851569972440911585811136891629011970553240975249828493677526267603951382178002945212421591[/CODE]

Approximately 23.3 hours on 2 threads Core i3-2310M with 4 GB memory for a 2.97M matrix at TD = 120. Truncated log (approximately 31k consecutive relation errors removed) is attached and at [URL="https://pastebin.com/kMQ4r4QH"]https://pastebin.com/kMQ4r4QH[/URL]

Factors added to FDB.

12p11_253 done
 

[code]
Sun Jun 2 03:14:41 2019 p87 factor: 699083612444429870672884265869061786052169969046557519608101577164226872560506318879599
Sun Jun 2 03:14:41 2019 p117 factor: 413578089323000584743006963513077601077909938819491536630363364614567120774528094991282453271176961319101361162372059
[/code]

36.2 hours on 20 threads across 10 cores Xeon Silver 4114, VBITS=256, for 13.19M matrix at density 118 (not 120). Log attached and at [url]https://pastebin.com/DtFmjaQu[/url]

I am off on a short cycling trip in the Netherlands (Rotterdam - Vlissingen out along the outer dykes and back along the inner dykes); 3p2_583 and 12m5_253 will be finished by my return.