![]() |
Taking C215_M17_k49a.
|
1 Attachment(s)
[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;517271]Taking C215_M17_k49a.[/QUOTE]
Done. [CODE] Tue May 21 04:39:27 2019 p101 factor: 26539982851470829552755580519948212531633274584160254491205906425994721691512497960904253081956840097 Tue May 21 04:39:27 2019 p115 factor: 3246213673097400470568980351118581466911007404777938266600864789690901834832891962635010517044250529573541648232801 [/CODE] [url]https://pastebin.com/fN81rD7a[/url] |
I see post-processing reservations have got wildly ahead of sieving on 15e, whilst sieving has got well ahead of post-processing on 14e.
Taking 1009_83m1 |
I’ve been on holiday in Ireland the past two weeks with one more week to go. I’ll restart my efforts on smaller jobs when I return.
|
[QUOTE=fivemack;517465]I see post-processing reservations have got wildly ahead of sieving on 15e, whilst sieving has got well ahead of post-processing on 14e.
Taking 1009_83m1[/QUOTE] Yes, a lot of composites were added during the BOINC pentathlon to keep up with the significant increase in the work rate. It'll take some time to post-process all of those. Plus, some jobs (like 2729513937247_19m1) have ridiculous duplicate rates, leading to unpleasantly large matrices which take a long time to handle. |
If someone could guide me on how to compile msieve under linux I can give a ran on a couple of post-processing 31-lp jobs under Linux Virtual Box.
|
[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;517503]If someone could guide me on how to compile msieve under linux I can give a ran on a couple of post-processing 31-lp jobs under Linux Virtual Box.[/QUOTE]
EdH has some excellent Linux installation/compile guides [url=https://www.mersenneforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=152]here[/url]. |
16097_59m1 factored
[CODE]p109 factor: 6687533846163179166550248047212354558316880733313207990211658125588643740432689389758024221559119827685008559
p136 factor: 1465438991374043626973980744069925137458410650323112567366625785041692584464664631373501142911928870243070593890596869829916387556942613[/CODE] 364M unique relations built a 19.2M matrix using TD=120. Solve time about 275 hours. (-t 4) Log at: [url]https://pastebin.com/jNTrr5HT[/url] |
[QUOTE=RichD;517599][CODE]p109 factor: 6687533846163179166550248047212354558316880733313207990211658125588643740432689389758024221559119827685008559
p136 factor: 1465438991374043626973980744069925137458410650323112567366625785041692584464664631373501142911928870243070593890596869829916387556942613[/CODE] 364M unique relations built a 19.2M matrix using TD=120. Solve time about 275 hours. (-t 4) Log at: [url]https://pastebin.com/jNTrr5HT[/url][/QUOTE] Someone seems to have erroneously recorded this finding in lasieved with the wrong factors and the wrong Pastebin link. |
[QUOTE=swellman;517623]Someone seems to have erroneously recorded this finding in lasieved with the wrong factors and the wrong Pastebin link.[/QUOTE]
The factors and link previously recorded are a duplicate of 160[B]5[/B]7_59m1. :-) |
[QUOTE=RichD;517626]The factors and link previously recorded are a duplicate of 160[B]5[/B]7_59m1. :-)[/QUOTE]
Fixed. |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 22:49. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.