C173_386xx483_19 factored
 

[CODE]p82 factor: 2125172089455544426335415591456370935227406383425776531940554910690525797814601283
p91 factor: 8042240197327184466737744417174807262890404918853443930089400664492617351975899306199914253[/CODE]
187M unique relations built a 12.7M matrix using TD=116 (TD=120 failed).
Solve time about 108 hours.

Log at: [url]https://pastebin.com/cnBW2p8d[/url]

[QUOTE=richs;494632]The LA locked up at 1.7% complete with 100% of memory in use, so I'm throwing in the towel. 8 Gb of memory isn't enough. Therefore,

Unreserving C159_263_107[/QUOTE]

Lionel, please note that I unreserved C_159_263_107. Thanks!

[QUOTE=debrouxl;494677]I've reserved it for you.

Note that the interpolation code suggests an upper bound of 72M, which is coherent with the number of raw relations displayed in the crunching page being quite low. You'd probably want me to queue the 60M-72M range, wouldn't you ?[/QUOTE]

Please queue 60-72M for C210_35111_47. Thanks!

[QUOTE=richs;494690]Lionel, please note that I unreserved C_159_263_107. Thanks![/QUOTE]

You already completed it as p74 * p86.

Did you mean C172_480xx101_19?

If so, I'll take C172_480xx101_19.

[QUOTE=RichD;494701]You already completed it as p74 * p86.

Did you mean C172_480xx101_19?

If so, I'll take C172_480xx101_19.[/QUOTE]

Yes, I meant I unreserved C172_480xx101_19, the 31 bit job (I don't know how I mixed up the two numbers!). So please take it.

Sorry for the mess up.

14e queue updated :smile:
Sorry for the delay. If I fail another time to update the queue for 3-4 days, I guess I'll just send my credentials to Sean...

Rich, I plan on queuing
[url]http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=494470&postcount=1570[/url]
[url]http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=494427&postcount=1566[/url]
to 14e.

[QUOTE=debrouxl;494836]Rich, I plan on queuing
[url]http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=494470&postcount=1570[/url]
[url]http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=494427&postcount=1566[/url]
to 14e.[/QUOTE]

Correct. Use 14e unless it explicitly says 15e. 95% of all of mine will use 14e for the time being.

C176_628xx943_3 factored
 

[CODE]p84 factor: 110181632599979962939156540544730233323972017762504755305788127095208294451420463199
p93 factor: 107255387322873648537317190653281303047821742196028276606633251265984898641677245845879184283[/CODE]
349M unique relations built a 17.7M matrix using TD=120 (TD=124 failed).
Solve time about 237 hours. (-t 4)

Log at: [url]https://pastebin.com/HtZDesyx[/url]

C178_147_59 Factored
 

[code]
p88 factor: 6059702862974039239527321086927626488552297059566068286432774915416449766729238943896841
p90 factor: 371541271565508843071777616505810738586930039477570033005757666512528608961642104171380057[/code]

480M raw relations / 352M unique with TD=112

Abbreviated log file attached.

C172_480xx101_19 factored
 

[CODE]p54 factor: 840921588962456498887539839555031859144445098779576677
p118 factor: 9805232082443999146129656891318799680438118600706684079396554395031942600593964338567478542469419802401223926796859529[/CODE]
173M unique relations built a 15.45M matrix using TD=104 (TD=108 failed).
Solve time about 162 hours (-t 4).

Log at: [url]https://pastebin.com/L0GeEnpe[/url]

Taking Phi_29(Phi_3(25457)/13).

C181_255xx161_3
 

After much banging around, managed to get a usable matrix from the C181_255xx161_3 dataset. Many bad/ugly relations, ETA ~745 hours (early Oct).