[QUOTE=ryanp;632938][CODE] p=11285155907, 22.40K p/sec, 22114 factors found at 1.67 sec per factor (last 303 min), 0.9% done. ETC 2023-07-16 20:51[/CODE][/QUOTE]
Is this with more candidates than the inital try? If not, 22.40K p/sec is still pretty slow.

[QUOTE=kruoli;632974]Is this with more candidates than the inital try? If not, 22.40K p/sec is still pretty slow.[/QUOTE]

No, same input file as the first try (~295K input terms). I'm using [C]-g 108[/C], and not passing [C]-G[/C] or [C]-W[/C].

Have you double checked that it is running on the correct device with [C]nvidia-smi[/C]? Which driver version are you using? What does [C]./xyyxsievecl -h[/C] give for OpenCL devices? Example:
[CODE]List of available platforms and devices
Platform 0 is a NVIDIA Corporation NVIDIA CUDA, version OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 12.1.68
Device 0 is a NVIDIA Corporation NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Device 1 is a NVIDIA Corporation NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti[/CODE]

[QUOTE=kruoli;632980]Have you double checked that it is running on the correct device with [C]nvidia-smi[/C]? Which driver version are you using? What does [C]./xyyxsievecl -h[/C] give for OpenCL devices? Example:
[CODE]List of available platforms and devices
Platform 0 is a NVIDIA Corporation NVIDIA CUDA, version OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 12.1.68
Device 0 is a NVIDIA Corporation NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Device 1 is a NVIDIA Corporation NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti[/CODE][/QUOTE]

There is only one GPU device on this system, and [C]nvidia-smi[/C] shows it 100% utilized.

[CODE]Sat Jun 24 14:11:10 2023
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| NVIDIA-SMI 530.30.02 Driver Version: 530.30.02 CUDA Version: 12.1 |
|-----------------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| GPU Name Persistence-M| Bus-Id Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |
| Fan Temp Perf Pwr:Usage/Cap| Memory-Usage | GPU-Util Compute M. |
| | | MIG M. |
|=========================================+======================+======================|
| 0 NVIDIA A100-SXM4-40GB On | 00000000:00:04.0 Off | 0 |
| N/A 54C P0 245W / 400W| 443MiB / 40960MiB | 100% Default |
| | | Disabled |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Processes: |
| GPU GI CI PID Type Process name GPU Memory |
| ID ID Usage |
|=======================================================================================|
| 0 N/A N/A 63836 C ./xyyxsievecl 440MiB |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
[/CODE]

[QUOTE=gd_barnes;632949]...For anyone using 1.7.2 for the extra speed because it is no longer missing factors when using the Legendre tables, you should be OK if your base is not a power. Storm and Pepi, this means you will be OK. Your bases 78 and 773 are not powers so this error will not affect them...[/QUOTE]

Very well. Thanks for the update.

I'm still seeing this with [C]xyyxsievecl[/C]:

[CODE]p=4764640901, 43.89K p/sec, 4310 factors found at 22.46 sec per factor
p=4764640901, 44.81K p/sec, 4391 factors found at 22.87 sec per factor
Fatal Error: Something is wrong. Counted terms (142382) != expected terms (146771)[/CODE]

rogue, I can send you an input file via PM if you want.

twinsieve issue
 

Hi, I've been experimenting with twinsieve and seem to have run into an issue when resuming a file. It seems to work fine if I start from scratch, but if I try to resume a sieve file it doesn't work. I have tried all formats and files created with twinsieve or newpgen doesn't seem to matter. Newpgen format doesn't give an error but just silently dies.

[CODE]
twinsieve v1.6.2, a program to find factors of k*b^n+1/-1 numbers for fixed b and n and variable k
Fatal Error: Line 1 exponents in ABCD input file twin.txt do not match[/CODE]

[QUOTE=k0r3;633109]Hi, I've been experimenting with twinsieve and seem to have run into an issue when resuming a file. It seems to work fine if I start from scratch, but if I try to resume a sieve file it doesn't work. I have tried all formats and files created with twinsieve or newpgen doesn't seem to matter. Newpgen format doesn't give an error but just silently dies.

[CODE]
twinsieve v1.6.2, a program to find factors of k*b^n+1/-1 numbers for fixed b and n and variable k
Fatal Error: Line 1 exponents in ABCD input file twin.txt do not match[/CODE][/QUOTE]

What command line arguments did you use to start (not continue) the sieve? What is the first line of the ABCD file?

[QUOTE=rogue;633113]What command line arguments did you use to start (not continue) the sieve? What is the first line of the ABCD file?[/QUOTE]

I have tried many different combinations of command line arguments and have not been able to get a file that works, here is my most recent one

[CODE].\twinsieve.exe -P 1e10 -o out.txt -k1 -K99999 -b2 -n12345 -t1[/CODE]

Here's the ABCD and Newpgen first lines I tried most recently.
[CODE]ABCD $a*2^12345+1 & $a*2^12345-1 [3339] // Sieved to 10000000019

9650251852537:T:0:2:3
1293 333330[/CODE]

[QUOTE=k0r3;633115]I have tried many different combinations of command line arguments and have not been able to get a file that works, here is my most recent one

[CODE].\twinsieve.exe -P 1e10 -o out.txt -k1 -K99999 -b2 -n12345 -t1[/CODE]

Here's the ABCD and Newpgen first lines I tried most recently.
[CODE]ABCD $a*2^12345+1 & $a*2^12345-1 [3339] // Sieved to 10000000019

9650251852537:T:0:2:3
1293 333330[/CODE][/QUOTE]

Problem found and fixed in sourceforge

[QUOTE=ryanp;633106]I'm still seeing this with [C]xyyxsievecl[/C]:

[CODE]p=4764640901, 43.89K p/sec, 4310 factors found at 22.46 sec per factor
p=4764640901, 44.81K p/sec, 4391 factors found at 22.87 sec per factor
Fatal Error: Something is wrong. Counted terms (142382) != expected terms (146771)[/CODE]

rogue, I can send you an input file via PM if you want.[/QUOTE]

Problem found and fixed in sourceforge.