![]() |
[QUOTE=DanielBamberger;475364]How long is the longest string of 1's? :innocent:[/QUOTE]If there is only one of something can it be considered the longest? Compared to what?
[size=1]So much impatience in this thread. Don't ya'all have something else more important to worry about?[/size] |
So if you wanted to print the full decimal expansion on US letter sheets at 6 point size with ½" margins, it would take approximately 2500 pages.
|
[QUOTE=Mark Rose;475367]So if you wanted to print the full decimal expansion on US letter sheets at 6 point size with ½" margins, it would take approximately 2500 pages.[/QUOTE]
Sounds about right. [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tlpYjrbujG0[/URL] |
[QUOTE=DanielBamberger;475368]Sounds about right. [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tlpYjrbujG0[/URL][/QUOTE]
I guess if I double-sided it, it would take only 1250 pages. I forgot you could do that with paper haha |
[QUOTE=chalsall;475251]Is that anything like "What is the sound of one hand clapping?" :wink:[/QUOTE]
[url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RUzbmIKVAHo[/url] [QUOTE=DanielBamberger;475368]Sounds about right. [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tlpYjrbujG0[/URL][/QUOTE] Now they can make a sequel. |
Yay! 2017 didn't get passed by without a Mersenne Prime being found.
It was a close one though! We need to get more compute! |
CUDALucas run is finished at 4320K:
M( 7xxxxxxx )P, n = 4320K, CUDALucas v2.05.1 That "P" is the very subtle sign saying "Prime!". Also another Prime95 run using 29.4 build 5 at 4096K. The original and Madpoo's run was both using Prime95 28.9: M7xxxxxxx is prime! Wg4: F9C5D09F,00000000 The Penultimate LL step is a + this time, so we are at 25+ and 24-. (There are only 49 as M1 = 2^2-1 = 3 does not have a penultimate step).. |
Well, well, looks like we´ve done it again, didn´t we? :showoff::toot::beer2::beer2:
What a nice way of wrapping 2017 up! It will be 16 years next month since I joined the project, and it´s good to see that our little community is still alive and kicking. Congrats everyone! (and no, I will not disclose the good news before the official announcement...) :smile::smile: |
[QUOTE=Mark Rose;475367]So if you wanted to print the full decimal expansion on US letter sheets at 6 point size with ½" margins, it would take approximately 2500 pages.[/QUOTE]
I calculated that this number have approx 23.1 million digits,so this number close to M77000000. |
[QUOTE=ATH;475449]The Penultimate LL step is a + this time, so we are at 25+ and 24-.
(There are only 49 as M1 = 2^2-1 = 3 does not have a penultimate step)..[/QUOTE] More importantly, is the new exponent "Team 1" or "Team 3" ? [CODE] 2, 2 3, 3 5, 1 7, 3 13, 1 17, 1 19, 3 31, 3 61, 1 89, 1 107, 3 127, 3 521, 1 607, 3 1279, 3 2203, 3 2281, 1 3217, 1 4253, 1 4423, 3 9689, 1 9941, 1 11213, 1 19937, 1 21701, 1 23209, 1 44497, 1 86243, 3 110503, 3 132049, 1 216091, 3 756839, 3 859433, 1 1257787, 3 1398269, 1 2976221, 1 3021377, 1 6972593, 1 13466917, 1 20996011, 3 24036583, 3 25964951, 3 30402457, 1 32582657, 1 37156667, 3 42643801, 1 43112609, 1 57885161, 1 74207281, 1 [/CODE] So far the counts are: [CODE] [B]mod 4[/B] 29 1 1 2 19 3 [/CODE] The [URL="https://primes.utm.edu/mersenne/heuristic.html"]Wagstaff conjecture[/URL] says that 1 is actually more common than 3, although this effect is more pronounced at lower exponent ranges. On a related note, if it's 1 or 7 mod 8, then the search for [URL="http://maths-people.anu.edu.au/~brent/trinom.html"]primitive trinomials[/URL] can begin again. The counts for that are: [CODE] 2, 2 3, 3 5, 5 7, 7 13, 5 17, 1 19, 3 31, 7 61, 5 89, 1 107, 3 127, 7 521, 1 607, 7 1279, 7 2203, 3 2281, 1 3217, 1 4253, 5 4423, 7 9689, 1 9941, 5 11213, 5 19937, 1 21701, 5 23209, 1 44497, 1 86243, 3 110503, 7 132049, 1 216091, 3 756839, 7 859433, 1 1257787, 3 1398269, 5 2976221, 5 3021377, 1 6972593, 1 13466917, 5 20996011, 3 24036583, 7 25964951, 7 30402457, 1 32582657, 1 37156667, 3 42643801, 1 43112609, 1 57885161, 1 74207281, 1 [/CODE] [CODE] [B]mod 8[/B] 19 1 1 2 9 3 10 5 10 7 [/CODE] |
[QUOTE=ATH;475449]...
The Penultimate LL step is a + this time, so we are at 25+ and 24-. (There are only 49 as M1 = 2^2-1 = 3 does not have a penultimate step)..[/QUOTE] I suppose you will get the s[SUB]0[/SUB] = 10 value as well, no doubt. As for s[SUB]0[/SUB] = 2/3, I am curious to learn if the Penultimate LL value is proven to be a simple function of p ...or only conjectured? Anyone? |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 08:27. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.