No sooner does one odd stat get sorted, another turns up. Still statistically valid though.

[CODE]

Results 4-5e18 5-6e18 8-9e18

% gaps >=1366 1.0% 1.2% [COLOR="Red"]1.1%
[/COLOR]% gaps >=1300 5.2% 5.4% 7.1%
% gaps >=1200 50.1% 58.3% 67.8%


[/CODE]

What is the expected value for gap=>1366 in 8-9 e18 range? 1.4? 1.5?

ok, i did a part of my range with gap5. can I continue to do it with gap9? (obviously the gap find will be ot of order)

I used this and used -n1 and n at the value of the last gap5 checkpoint

[code] gap9 -n1 5781952884048527160 -n2 5800e15 -n 5781952884048527160 -res1 0
-res2 8151 -res 0 -m1 1190 -m2 8151 -numcoprime 27 -sb 24 -bs 18 -t 2 -mem 6
[/code]

(the range seem to fit into 3 gig)

are these reasonable parametters? or should I go back to gap5?

[QUOTE=firejuggler;464118]are these reasonable parametters?[/QUOTE]
For such a short range, the recommended parameter is m2 = res2 = 429

[QUOTE=firejuggler;464118]ok, i did a part of my range with gap5. can I continue to do it with gap9? (obviously the gap find will be ot of order)

I used this and used -n1 and n at the value of the last gap5 checkpoint

[code] gap9 -n1 5781952884048527160 -n2 5800e15 -n 5781952884048527160 -res1 0
-res2 8151 -res 0 -m1 1190 -m2 8151 -numcoprime 27 -sb 24 -bs 18 -t 2 -mem 6
[/code]

(the range seem to fit into 3 gig)

are these reasonable parametters? or should I go back to gap5?[/QUOTE]

In my opinion there is nothing against it. As already recommended by axn, you should use the parameters m2 = res2 = 429.
But you should wait for Robert's official O.K. :smile:

As an additional check I'm willing to do the double checking with gap5 for that range.

[QUOTE=Thomas11;464126]In my opinion there is nothing against it. As already recommended by axn, you should use the parameters m2 = res2 = 429.
But you should wait for Robert's official O.K. :smile:

As an additional check I'm willing to do the double checking with gap5 for that range.[/QUOTE]

Here is the official. :paul: Looks good to me!

Here is a :beer2: for danaj

[QUOTE=robert44444uk;464130]Here is a :beer2: for danaj[/QUOTE]

It is better not to give out this, even if you have already sent it to Dr. Thomas R. Nicely, because the page is not updated at: [url]http://www.trnicely.net/gaps/gaplist.html[/url] .

danaj posted it here so it is public information. He is confident about his relationship with Dr Nicely!

There is also independent corroboration in this forum by a post and a timestamp
[CODE]Last fiddled with by rudy235 on 2017-07-23 at 22:23 Reason: Missed Dana Record.[/CODE]

We are about 2/3 done on this Range.

However the gremlins have conspired against us and we still cannot breach the "gap" of 5049-4050. Dana tell me it should come out in 11.5 hours.

Once we get that one we will have a lot of good news to share.:party: