![]() |
[QUOTE=kriesel;501615]Yay, saved almost 90% of the PRP run time (and 100% of any future PRP DC).
The server's parsing of the result looks incomplete to me: [URL]https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=89625761&exp_hi=&full=1[/URL] shows "Factor:" as result for that, while an ordinary P-1 factor shows up as "Factor: 3326174307660372811303879 / (P-1, B1=730000, B2=14782500, E=12)" for [URL]https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=89694721&full=1[/URL][/QUOTE] Yes, James is aware of the parsing problem, will be fixed. |
1 Attachment(s)
[QUOTE=SELROC;501127]First attempt to build a Debian source package with
[CODE]dpkg-source --build . [/CODE][/QUOTE] second attempt to build a Debian source package, with upstream build system "pbuilder". |
[QUOTE=SELROC;501648]second attempt to build a Debian source package, with upstream build system "pbuilder".[/QUOTE]
Debian Request for Sponsorship and bug filed: [url]https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=915704[/url] |
[QUOTE=SELROC;501844]Debian Request for Sponsorship and bug filed:
[URL]https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=915704[/URL][/QUOTE] But I went ahead and uploaded the package myself: [url]https://mentors.debian.net/package/gpuowl[/url] I am now a Debian maintainer |
[QUOTE=SELROC;501886]But I went ahead and uploaded the package myself:
[url]https://mentors.debian.net/package/gpuowl[/url] I am now a Debian maintainer[/QUOTE] Cool, congrats! Let me know if there's anything I can help with. And thanks! |
[QUOTE=preda;501964]Cool, congrats! Let me know if there's anything I can help with. And thanks![/QUOTE]
I don't know if you are "back to home" :-) I have submitted a pull request for gpuowl that includes all the files needed for debian. - Important for you: you need to run cppcheck against gpuowl source - Important for me: I need to run Lintian against the gpuowl package |
[QUOTE=SELROC;501965]I don't know if you are "back to home" :-)
I have submitted a pull request for gpuowl that includes all the files needed for debian. - Important for you: you need to run cppcheck against gpuowl source - Important for me: I need to run Lintian against the gpuowl package[/QUOTE] Hi Valerio, I just moved into a new home, and I did turn on the desktop already :) I ran cppcheck and fixed everything except a few "style" issues. |
[QUOTE=preda;502011]Hi Valerio, I just moved into a new home, and I did turn on the desktop already :)
I ran cppcheck and fixed everything except a few "style" issues.[/QUOTE] Thats cool, I hope you enjoy your new home, for the moment I am going to sleep, so tomorrow I update the package. |
[QUOTE=preda;502011]Hi Valerio, I just moved into a new home, and I did turn on the desktop already :)
I ran cppcheck and fixed everything except a few "style" issues.[/QUOTE] Hi, [url]https://github.com/preda/gpuowl/issues/20#issuecomment-445437109[/url] |
[QUOTE=SELROC;502012]Thats cool, I hope you enjoy your new home, for the moment I am going to sleep, so tomorrow I update the package.[/QUOTE]
Hi, look here, [url]https://mentors.debian.net/[/url] |
missing newline case
In v5.0-5c13870, at least if doing PRP (no P-1), result lines output to the results.txt file seem to be lacking the trailing \n and so append onto a single run-on record.
|
| All times are UTC. The time now is 23:11. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.