[URL="https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/gigabyte-gtx-1070-founders-edition.b3639"]1070[/URL][CODE]2020-11-24 19:07:49 GeForce GTX 1070-0 OpenCL compilation in 1.61 s
2020-11-24 19:07:51 GeForce GTX 1070-0 77936867 OK 0 loaded: blockSize 400, 0000000000000003
2020-11-24 19:07:57 GeForce GTX 1070-0 77936867 OK 800 0.00%; 4528 us/it; ETA 4d 02:02; 1579c241dc63eca6 (check 1.87s)
2020-11-24 19:23:33 GeForce GTX 1070-0 77936867 OK 200000 0.26%; 4691 us/it; ETA 4d 05:17; f0b04b45b0855bd2 (check 1.96s)
2020-11-24 19:39:41 GeForce GTX 1070-0 77936867 OK 400000 0.51%; 4830 us/it; ETA 4d 08:01; c03f94396a5aa29e (check 2.12s)
2020-11-24 19:55:59 GeForce GTX 1070-0 77936867 OK 600000 0.77%; 4877 us/it; ETA 4d 08:46; b9decd65ca71b629 (check 2.04s)[/CODE]

For Arch I have created a working PKGBUILD for gpuowl, based on the stable tag version. You can find it here: [URL="https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gpuowl/"]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gpuowl/[/URL].

[QUOTE=Dylan14;564902]For Arch I have created a working PKGBUILD for gpuowl, based on the stable tag version. You can find it here: [URL="https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gpuowl/"]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gpuowl/[/URL].[/QUOTE]

Nice, thank you! I hope others will find the package useful.

This time I had one from the first batch delivered, a RTX 3060 ti from Gigabyte Aorus Ti Master

Factory clock setting is 1800 MHz and 1400 Mhz memory, CPU-Z 1.94.8 reports 2010 MHz clock and 6800 MHz memory. Mfaktc reports 1800 MHz clock and 7000 MHz memory.

Under Windows using gpuowl v6.11-380:

[CODE]
2020-12-04 15:06:46 GeForce RTX 3060 Ti-0 OpenCL compilation in 2.33 s
2020-12-04 15:06:48 GeForce RTX 3060 Ti-0 57885161 OK 0 loaded: blockSize 400, 0000000000000003
2020-12-04 15:06:48 GeForce RTX 3060 Ti-0 validating proof residues for power 8
2020-12-04 15:06:48 GeForce RTX 3060 Ti-0 Proof using power 8
2020-12-04 15:06:50 GeForce RTX 3060 Ti-0 57885161 OK 800 0.00%; 2379 us/it; ETA 1d 14:15; 5727fe6a7225c273 (check 1.00s)
2020-12-04 15:14:49 GeForce RTX 3060 Ti-0 57885161 OK 200000 0.35%; 2399 us/it; ETA 1d 14:26; de62d6db1ad5092d (check 1.01s)
2020-12-04 15:22:51 GeForce RTX 3060 Ti-0 57885161 OK 400000 0.69%; 2401 us/it; ETA 1d 14:20; 45e043b36f3556e1 (check 1.01s)
[/CODE]

and for Moebius

[CODE]
2020-12-04 15:24:04 GeForce RTX 3060 Ti-0 OpenCL compilation in 2.05 s
2020-12-04 15:24:06 GeForce RTX 3060 Ti-0 77936867 OK 0 loaded: blockSize 400, 0000000000000003
2020-12-04 15:24:06 GeForce RTX 3060 Ti-0 validating proof residues for power 8
2020-12-04 15:24:06 GeForce RTX 3060 Ti-0 Proof using power 8
2020-12-04 15:24:10 GeForce RTX 3060 Ti-0 77936867 OK 800 0.00%; 3232 us/it; ETA 2d 21:59; 1579c241dc63eca6 (check 1.35s)
2020-12-04 15:35:04 GeForce RTX 3060 Ti-0 77936867 OK 200000 0.26%; 3276 us/it; ETA 2d 22:44; f0b04b45b0855bd2 (check 1.36s)
2020-12-04 15:45:56 GeForce RTX 3060 Ti-0 77936867 OK 400000 0.51%; 3256 us/it; ETA 2d 22:08; c03f94396a5aa29e (check 1.36s)
[/CODE]

Quick question: How much PCIe bandwidth does gpuOwl need if no monitor is connected? I found out that GPUs when used for mining cryptocurrencies, can work with PCIe x1 Gen 1. Is that the case for gpuOwl, too?

[QUOTE=Viliam Furik;565380]Quick question: How much PCIe bandwidth does gpuOwl need if no monitor is connected? I found out that GPUs when used for mining cryptocurrencies, can work with PCIe x1 Gen 1. Is that the case for gpuOwl, too?[/QUOTE]My mining rig style systems say x1 to x16 extenders are fine, for gpuowl or mfaktc etc. There may be some performance loss during gpu-host transfers, but it's offset by better cooling and higher gpu count.
If you find a utility to easily look at PCIe traffic stats on Windows, please post a link.
[URL]https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Tuning-Performance/Monitoring-PCI-performance-from-software/td-p/765471[/URL]
Alas, Radeon Vii, on PCIe V2, x1 to x16 extender, and GPU-Z combo, does not display Bus interface load, although RTX2080Super does (note the 0% usage there, on PCIe x16 V1.1). On a GTX1080 in PCIe v2x16 direct, it's running 48% in 183M PRP. I don't think I have any PCIe v1.0 to test. Even the Core2 Duos and Quadro 4000 or 2000s are V1.1 or higher. I'm running gpuowl 6.x and 7.x on Radeons with a PCIe Gen1 setting in the motherboard BIOS, and getting within ~10% on Windows 10 of what others report getting for throughput on Linux.

Some interesting instrumentation here: [url]https://github.com/opcm/pcm/blob/master/README.md[/url]

After switching to Windows 10, I got gpuowl V6.11-380 to run on my ASRock Deskmini A300W, AMD A8-9600, 16GB DDR-4, SSD.

I tried multiple times to get ROCm to work in linux but it seems like I still have some learning to do before I can make that happen. After seeing the mprime performance of the AMD A8-9600, (max output 13 GHz-D/day while using 70W power) I shut down the computer and started looking for a Zen 2 series cpu to replace it. I got bored waiting for the cpu prices to come down and decided to try again with Windows 10. The iGPU works better than I thought it would. Mfakto results will be posted in the proper thread as well.

Moebius, here is your timing:

[CODE]\gpuowl\611380>gpuowl-win -iters 200000 -prp 77936867
2020-12-05 18:14:05 gpuowl v6.11-380-g79ea0cc
2020-12-05 18:14:05 config: -iters 200000 -prp 77936867
2020-12-05 18:14:05 Bristol Ridge-0 77936867 FFT: 4M 1K:8:256 (18.58 bpw)
2020-12-05 18:14:11 Bristol Ridge-0 OpenCL compilation in 4.82 s
2020-12-05 18:14:17 Bristol Ridge-0 77936867 OK 800 loaded: blockSize 400, 1579c241dc63eca6
2020-12-05 18:14:17 Bristol Ridge-0 validating proof residues for power 8
2020-12-05 18:14:17 Bristol Ridge-0 Proof using power 8
2020-12-05 18:14:34 Bristol Ridge-0 77936867 OK 1600 0.00%; 13289 us/it; ETA 11d 23:41; 0f62a1fcc1c78fe9 (check 5.49s)
2020-12-05 18:58:18 Bristol Ridge-0 77936867 OK 200000 0.26%; 13201 us/it; ETA 11d 21:04; f0b04b45b0855bd2 (check 5.19s)
2020-12-05 18:58:23 Bristol Ridge-0 Stopping, please wait..
2020-12-05 18:58:33 Bristol Ridge-0 77936867 OK 200800 0.26%; 12658 us/it; ETA 11d 09:20; 895b034c5473a608 (check 5.21s)
2020-12-05 18:58:33 Bristol Ridge-0 Exiting because "stop requested"[/CODE]

[QUOTE=Viliam Furik;565380]Quick question: How much PCIe bandwidth does gpuOwl need if no monitor is connected? I found out that GPUs when used for mining cryptocurrencies, can work with PCIe x1 Gen 1. Is that the case for gpuOwl, too?[/QUOTE]

GpuOwl uses very very little PCIe bandwidth. I regularly run it over PCIe x1 Gen1 without significant slowdown.

Thx to aheeffer and DrobinsonPE. The values ​​are now in the list.

[URL="https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/radeon-pro-wx-2100.c2979"]Radeon Pro WX 2100[/URL][CODE]2020-12-10 18:40:54 gfx804-0 OpenCL compilation in 1.72 s
2020-12-10 18:41:18 gfx804-0 77936867 OK 800 0.00%; 14048 us/it; ETA 12d 16:08; 1579c241dc63eca6 (check 5.68s)
2020-12-10 18:43:33 gfx804-0 77936867 OK 10000 0.01%; 14107 us/it; ETA 12d 17:22; fc4f135f7cf4ad29 (check 5.68s)
2020-12-10 18:46:00 gfx804-0 77936867 OK 20000 0.03%; 14084 us/it; ETA 12d 16:50; 3cd1bd9d5e09cbc5 (check 5.68s)
2020-12-10 18:48:26 gfx804-0 77936867 OK 30000 0.04%; 14085 us/it; ETA 12d 16:49; c4e0ff35e3290d98 (check 5.68s)
2020-12-10 18:50:53 gfx804-0 77936867 OK 40000 0.05%; 14086 us/it; ETA 12d 16:48; dffe1b1b0d748128 (check 5.69s)
2020-12-10 18:53:19 gfx804-0 77936867 OK 50000 0.06%; 14087 us/it; ETA 12d 16:46; 52e286945371ed29 (check 5.68s)
2020-12-10 18:55:47 gfx804-0 77936867 OK 60000 0.08%; 14174 us/it; ETA 12d 18:37; 0945da4dc08bdd95 (check 5.69s)[/CODE]