![]() |
[QUOTE=robert44444uk;461830]I shall be updating posts #1 and #3 up to Sunday evening, but I will be travelling for 1 week and hence if you wish to reserve further ranges, maybe it will be better to reserve them before this coming Sunday.[/QUOTE]
Since 4680-4689 will be done by Monday (without any spectacular result yet), I'll take 4670-4679 too. |
Can you please add some speed figures just to understand how quickly we are going (all threads used for the project)?
My case between 15e9 n/sec to 18e9 n/sec, but better consider the former as standard. |
[B]Some statistics of the 1000 e15 ranges –Only groups of 100 Ranges with ≥ 5% completeness are reported– 594 ranges completed.[/B]
Exhaustive search [SIZE="4"][B]4000 -4280[/B][/SIZE] [B]Range 4000 -4200 [/B] Completeness 100%. Highest gaps achieved a) 1368 Thomas11 Previously found by LLh in 2011 b) 1380 Thomas11 Previously found by Hertzog and Oliveira Silva in 2007 [B]Range 4200 -4300[/B] Completeness 75% Highest gaps achieved a) 1362 Antonio Previously found by Oliveira Silva in 2011 b) 1372 Antonio Previously found by LLh in 2014 c) 1440 Antonio Previously found by LLh in 2014 [B]Range 4300 -4400[/B] Completeness 100% Highest gap achieved 1386 danaj Previously found by Pardi and Oliveira Silva in 2012 [B]Range 4400 -4500[/B] Completeness 79% Highest gaps achieved a) 1362 Thomas (ties with Antonio R 4223 but Previously found by Oliveira Silva in 2011 b) Thomas 1352 Previously found by LLh in 2015 [B]Range 4500 -4600[/B] Completeness 5% Highest gaps achieved by 1236 danaj <1346 [B]Range 4600 -4700[/B] Completeness 30% Highest gap achieved 1430 Robert444UK Previously found by LLh in 2017 (just 2 weeks ago! See [URL="http://mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=460534&postcount=174"]here[/URL]) [B]Range 4700 -4800[/B] Completeness 90% Highest gap achieved 1374 by danaj previously found in 2011 by Pardi and Oliveira Silva [B]Range 4800 -4900[/B] To be populated [B]Range 4900 -4999[/B] Completeness 10% Highest gaps achieved a) 1260 pinhodecarlos Not > 1344 Up to this point (with 59.4% or the ranges finished) 10 Gaps ≥ 1346 have been found and [U]all of them have been previously reported. [/U] 5 as C?C and 5 as CFC. However, only 1 more C?C gap already found ([B]1346[/B] ) is remaining in the ranges 4646-4647 Once we complete the ranges 4700- 4800 -4900 -4999 there is a chance -i.e. educated guess– of finding [B]up to 4 new gaps,[/B] either CFC [B]gaps[/B] previously found, or C?C not yet discovered in this range. |
[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;461885]Can you please add some speed figures just to understand how quickly we are going (all threads used for the project)?[/quote]
Currently I'm running at about 140e9 n/s. I will drop the 50 n/s machine in a month, but might add a Windows machine to make up for it a little. |
[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;461885]Can you please add some speed figures just to understand how quickly we are going (all threads used for the project)?
My case between 15e9 n/sec to 18e9 n/sec, but better consider the former as standard.[/QUOTE] In my case, using an i5-3570k @ 4.44GHz, threads= 4, memory= 12GB and I'm getting around 27.3e9 n/sec. So that's 6.148e9 n/sec/GHz, or 1.537e9 n/sec/GHz/thread. |
[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;461885]Can you please add some speed figures just to understand how quickly we are going (all threads used for the project)?[/QUOTE]
I'm currently using 4 older non-AVX Xeons with 8 resp. 12 cores yielding between 20e9/sec and 28.8e9/sec. So my overall throughput is around 100e9/sec. There is also an additional i7-3770 at home, but it's turned off until the heatwave is over... |
My throughput is about 23 on a 4 core desktop and 6 occasionally on my work laptop. Average I think of 27
|
1 Attachment(s)
4479-4481 done.
|
4511-4512e15 97 kgaps, largest 1142 @ 4511792922075642737 and 4512712221084984239
4512-4513e15 121 kgaps, largest 1188 @ 4512065311767460151 4513-4514e15 110 kgaps, largest 1166 @ 4513647056235171623 |
[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;461904]4479-4481 done.[/QUOTE]
Another gap ≥ 1346 1350 @ 4480897278955294741 Unfortunately it is not a [U]first known occurrence[/U] at it was originally 1350 CFC TOeSilva 2008 @ 1180351752204137089 STILL INTERESTING! |
Latest stats: we are more than 60% of the way there. And we are probably getting to the point where we are finished repeating the work of others.
[CODE] Searcher done resd danaj 205 66 Thomas11 170 75 antonio 91 20 robert44444uk 84 14 pinhodecarlos 36 29 mart_r 13 20 ET_ 7 0 henryzz 4 6 ldesnogu 0 20 Total 610 250 [/CODE] |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 22:04. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.